Ukraine’s cooperation with the EU in the field of preventing and countering corruption




corruption, anti-corruption legislation, EU support programs, European anti-corruption policy.


Introduction. In the context of victory in the war with russia and the subsequent economic recovery and development of Ukraine, the issue of overcoming corruption in the country becomes extremely important.

Problem. As the practice of war shows, corruption has a negative impact on the condition of the state’s defense capabilities, as it primarily prevents the effective and rational use of available financial resources to support the Ukrainian military.

The aim of the article is to describe Ukraine’s cooperation with the EU in the field of preventing and countering corruption, in particular the directions of EU support for anti-corruption activities, joint anti-corruption programs and the state of implementation of the European experience of anti-corruption policy in Ukraine.

Methods. Methods of structural-logical and system-functional analysis; methods of abstraction and generalization; analogies and comparisons; recommendatory method are applied.

Results. The areas of EU support in the field of anti-corruption, the development and implemen­tation of joint programs in this field have been analyzed. EU programs and projects in the field of anti-corruption activities are systematized with an analysis of their effectiveness. The state of imple­mentation of provisions, principles and standards of international legislation in the field of anti-corruption in Ukraine has been studied.

Conclusions. The study of the implementation of the European experience of anti-corruption policy in Ukraine will contribute to the achievement of significant progress in the prevention and counte­raction of corruption in the process of post-war recovery and reconstruction of Ukraine. As a result of the analysis of the cooperation and experience of European countries, measures are proposed, the imple­mentation of which will lead to a more effective fight against corruption and accelerate the further movement of Ukraine in the direction of membership in the European Union, the North Atlantic Alliance (NATO) and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

Author Biographies

Anatolii MAZARAKI, State University of Trade and Economics

Doctor of Science (Economics), Professor, Rector

Tetiana MELNYK, State University of Trade and Economics

Doctor of Science (Economics), Professor, Head of the Department of International Management


Corruption Perceptions Index. [in English].

Stefanishyna, O. JeS pidtverdyv progres Ukrai'ny u vykonanni semy rekomen¬dacij Jevrokomisii' ta gotovnist' nadaty poperednju ocinku navesni. Urjadovyj portal 16 grudnja 2022 roku [The EU confirmed Ukraine’s progress in implementing the seven recommendations of the European Commission and its readiness to provide a preliminary assessment in the spring. Government portal on December 16, 2022] [in Ukrainian].

Rada JeS zatverdyla dopomogu Ukrai'ni v obsjazi 18 mil'jardiv jevro. 12.12.2022. Brjussel' [The EU Council approved aid to Ukraine in the amount of 18 billion euros. 12.12.2022. Brussels] [in Ukrainian].

Claire, A. Dunlop, (2020) Jonathan Kamkhaji, Claudio M Radaelli, Gaia Taffoni & Claudius Wagemann Does consultation count for corruption? The causal relations in the EU-28, Journal of European Public Policy, 27:11, 1718-1741 [in English].

OECD. (2010). Better regulation in Sweden services. OECD Publishing. [in English].

OECD. (2011). Government at a glance 2011. OECD Publishing. [in English].

Citizen engagement in rule-making – Evidence on regulatory practices in 185 countries. Policy Research working paper; no. WPS 7840 Washington, DC: World Bank Group [in English].

IMF. (2008). The IMF and Good Governance, A factsheet Retrieved July 25, 2019, URL: [in English].

UN Habitat and Transparency International. (2004). Tools to support transparency in local governance [in English].

UNODC. (2004). United Nations convention against corruption, priorities for the provision of technical assistance. Global Programme against Corruption [in English].

Regulatory procedure and participation in the European Union. In F. Bignami & D. Zaring (Eds.), The Elgar Handbook on comparative law and regulation (pp. 129-159). Edward Elgar [in English].

Radaelli, C. M. (2005). Diffusion without convergence: How political context shapes the adoption of regulatory impact assessment. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 924-943. [in English].

Radaelli, C. M. (2009). Desperately Seeking Regulatory Impact Assessment: Diary of a reflective researcher. Evaluation, 15(1), 31-48 [in English].

Radaelli, C. M. (2010). Regulating rule-making via impact assessment. Governance, 23(1), 89-108. [in English].

Radaelli, C. M., & Meuwese, A. C. M. (2009). Better regulation in Europe: Between public management and regulatoy reform. Public Administration, 87(3), 639-654. [in English].

Wolf, S. (2010) Assessing Eastern Europe's anti-corruption performance: views from the Council of Europe, OECD, and Transparency International, Global Crime, 11:2, 99-121, [in English].

Smismans, S. (2016). Regulatory procedure and participation in the European Union. In F. Bignami & D. Zaring (Eds.), The Elgar Handbook on comparative law and regulation (pp. 129–159). Edward Elgar [in English].

Radaelli, C. M., & Meuwese, A. C. M. (2009). Better regulation in Europe: Between public management and regulatoy reform. Public Administration, 87(3), 639-654. [in English].

Villoria, M., Van Ryzin, G. G., & Lavena, C. F. (2013). Social and political consequences of administrative corruption: A study of public perceptions in Spain. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 85-94. [in English].

Salvati, M. (2006). The long history of corporatism in Italy: A question of culture or economics? Contemporary European History, 15(2), 223-244. [in English].

Veenendaal, W. (2019). How smallness fosters clientelism: A case study of Malta. Political Studies,

Salminen, A. (2013). Control of corruption: The case of Finland. In J. S. T. Quah (Ed.), Different paths to curbing corruption (Research in public policy analysis and management, (Vol. 23) (pp. 57-77). Emerald Group Publishing [in English].

Pridham, G. (2009). Securing the only game in town: The EU’s political conditionality and democratic consolidation in post-Soviet Latvia. Europe-Asia Studies, 61(1), 51-84. [in English].

Kaja Gadowska (2010) National and international anti-corruption efforts: the case of Poland, Global Crime, 11:2, 178-209, [in English].

Borovyk, A. V. (2021). Zarubizhnyj dosvid protydii' korupcijnym kryminal'nym pravoporushennjam ta mozhlyvist' jogo zastosuvannja v Ukrai'ni [Foreign experience of countering corruption criminal offenses and the possibility of its application in Ukraine]. [in English].

Busol, O. Ju. (2014). Protydija korupcijnij zlochynnosti v Ukrai'ni u suchasnyj period [Anti-corruption crime in Ukraine in the modern period]. Kyi'v. In Jure [in Ukrainian].

Burjak, K. (2020). Osoblyvosti antykorupcijnogo zakonodavstva v krai'nah Jevropejs'kogo Sojuzu [Peculiarities of anti-corruption legislation in the countries of the European Union]. Pidpryjemnyctvo, gospodarstvo i pravo – Entrepreneurship, economy and law, 2, 356-360 [in Ukrainian].

Nevmerzhyc'kyj, Je. (2009). Korupcija jak social'no-politychnyj fenomen: dys. ... dokt. polit. nauk:23.00.02 [Corruption as a socio-political phenomenon: thes. ... Dr. of Polit. Sciences 23.00.02] Kyi'v [in Ukrainian].

Kalatur, M. (2020). Vykorystannja Ukrai'noju dosvidu slidchyh organiv SShA, Francii' ta Nimechchyny [23.00.02] [Ukraine's use of the experience of the investigative bodies of the USA, France and Germany] [in Ukrainian].

Zvit pro vykonannja Ugody pro asociaciju mizh Ukrai'noju ta Jevropejs'kym Sojuzom 2015-2020. Jevrointegracijnyj portal [Report on the implementation of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the European Union 2015-2020. European integration portal]. [in Ukrainian].

European Parliament resolution of 11 February 2021 on the implementation of the EU Association Agreement with Ukraine (2019/2202(INI). [in English].

Zajava JeS: Antykorupcijnu strukturu treba shvydko vidnovyty, ce umova bezvizu i findopomogy [EU statement: The anti-corruption structure must be quickly restored, this is a condition of visa-free and financial assistance]. Jevropejs'ka pravda – European truth, 3.11. (2020). [in Ukrainian].

Rishennja KSU u spravi za konstytucijnym podannjam 47 narodnyh deputativ Ukrai'ny shhodo vidpovidnosti Konstytucii' Ukrai'ny (konstytucijnosti) okremyh polozhen' Zakonu Ukrai'ny «Pro zapobigannja korupcii'», Kryminal'nogo kodeksu Ukrai'ny No13 vid 27 zhovtnja 2020r. KSU [The decision of the CCU in the case based on the constitutional submission of 47 People's Deputies of Ukraine regarding compliance with the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) of certain provisions of the Law of Ukraine «On Prevention of Corruption», Criminal Code of Ukraine No13 of October 27, 2020. CCU] [in Ukrainian].

Joint Staff Working Document – Association Implementation Report on Ukraine. EEAS, 1 December 2020. [in English].

Judicial and Anti-Corruption Reform Priorities, a takozh vysnovky Venecians'koi' Komisii' shhodo proektiv zakoniv No3711 («Pro vnesennja zmin do Zakonu Ukrai'ny «Pro sudoustrij i status suddiv» ta dejakyh zakoniv Ukrai'ny shhodo dijal'nosti Verhovnogo Sudu ta organiv suddivs'kogo vrjaduvannja» vid 22 chervnja 2020 r. [conclusions of the Venice Commission regarding draft laws No3711 («On Amendments to the Law of Ukraine «On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges» and some laws of Ukraine on the activities of the Supreme Court and bodies of judicial governance" dated June 22, 2020], ta No5068 («Pro vnesennja zmin do dejakyh zakoniv Ukrai'ny shhodo porjadku obrannja (pryznachennja) na posady chleniv Vyshhoi' rady pravo-suddja ta dijal'nosti dyscyplinarnyh inspektoriv Vyshhoi' rady pravosuddja» 15 ljutogo 2021 r. [(«On amendments to some laws of Ukraine regarding the procedure for the election (appointment) of members of the Supreme Council of Justice and the activities of disciplinary inspectors of the Supreme Council of Justice» February 15, 2021]. [in Ukrainian].

Association Implementation Report on Ukraine. — European Commission, URL: [in English].

Jevroparlament vkazav Ukrai'ni na neobhidnist' zavershyty reformy u sferi verhovenstva prava ta borot'by z korupcijeju. — Interfaks-Ukrai'na, 11 ljutogo 2021 r. [The European Parliament pointed out to Ukraine the need to complete reforms in the sphere of the rule of law and the fight against corruption. — Interfax-Ukraine, February 11, 2021] [in Ukrainian].

Zahidni kredytory Ukrai'ny poperedyly VR pro problemy z proceduroju zaminy Holodnyc'kogo [Western creditors of Ukraine warned the Verkhovna Rada about problems with the procedure for replacing Kholodnytskyi]. Jevropejs'ka pravda – European truth, 3 veresnja 2020 r. ; U Jevroparlamenti prygrozyly skasuvannjam bezvizu okremym ukrai'ns'kym oligarham i politykam [The European Parliament threatened to cancel visa-free for some Ukrainian oligarchs and politicians. Jevropejs'ka pravda – European truth, 5 zhovtnja 2020 r. [in Ukrainian].

Indeks spryjnjattja korupcii' – 2021 [Index of perception of corruption – 2021] [in Ukrainian].

VAKS rozgljadaje spravu pro habar zamministra na sumu $400 tysjach [VAKS is considering the case of the deputy minister's bribe in the amount of $400,000]. [in Ukrainian].

Za faktamy rozkradannja gumanitarnoi' dopomogy v Ukrai'ni vidkryto 370 kryminal'nyh provadzhen' [370 criminal proceedings have been opened in Ukraine for embezzlement of humanitarian aid] [in Ukrainian].

Minoborony uklalo ugodu na harchi dlja vijs'kovyh za majzhe vtrychi zavyshhenymy cinamy [The Ministry of Defense concluded an agreement on food for the military at almost triple inflated prices]. 21.01.23. [in Ukrainian].

Council of Europe: Anti-corruption reform in Ukraine. Deutsche Welle, 26.03.2020. [in English].

Antykorupcijna iniciatyva JeS v Ukrai'ni [Anti-corruption initiative of the EU in Ukraine.] [in Ukrainian].

UGODA mizh Urjadom Ukrai'ny ta Jevropejs'koju Komisijeju pro finansuvannja zahodu «Antykorupcijna iniciatyva JeS v Ukrai'ni – faza II». [AGREEMENT between the Government of Ukraine and the European Commission on the financing the event «Anti-corruption initiative of the EU in Ukraine – phase II»] [in Ukrainian].

Ramkova programa spivpraci mizh Jevropejs'kym Sojuzom ta Radoju Jevropy dlja krai'n Shidnogo partnerstva. Spil'nyj proekt «Borot'ba z korupcijeju v Ukrai'ni». [Framework program of cooperation between the European Union and the Council of Europe for the Eastern Partnership countries. Joint project «Fighting corruption in Ukraine».] [in Ukrainian].

Special Report 23/2021: Reducing grand corruption in Ukraine: several EU initiatives, but still insufficient results. [in English].

Zakon Ukrai'ny «Pro zapobigannja korupcii'» //Vidomosti Verhovnoi' Rady (VVR), 2014, № 49, st. 2056 [The Law of Ukraine «On Prevention of Corruption» // Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada (BVR), 2014, № 49, Art. 2056] [in Ukrainian].

Zakon Ukrai'ny «Pro derzhavnu sluzhbu» // Vidomosti Verhovnoi' Rady (VVR), 2016, № 4, st .43 [Law of Ukraine «On State Service» // Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada (BVR), 2016, № 4, Art.43] [in Ukrainian].

Zakon Ukrai'ny «Pro sluzhbu v organah miscevogo samovrjaduvannja» [Law of Ukraine «On Service in Local Self-Government Bodies»]. Vidomosti Verhovnoi' Rady Ukrai'ny (VVR) – Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (IVR), (2001), 33. [in Ukrainian].

Nakaz Nacional'nogo agentstva Ukrai'ny z pytan' derzhavnoi' sluzhby vid 5 serpnja 2016 roku № 158 «Pro zatverdzhennja Zagal'nyh pravyl etychnoi' povedinky derzhavnyh sluzhbovciv ta posadovyh osib miscevogo samovrjaduvannja».[Order of the National Agency of Ukraine on Civil Service Issues of August 5, 2016 № 158 «On Approval of the General Rules of Ethical Behaviour of Civil Servants and Local Self-Government Officials»]. [in Ukrainian].

Johannsen, l. (2011). And hilmer pedersen k. For the common good: combating corruption in new eu member, States journal of comparative politic.s (Vol 4), 1,

Transparency International. [in Ukrainian].

Mitchell, Z., Merrington, S., & Bell P. A. (n.d.). Comparative Analysis of the OECD Anti-Corruption Models (Asia & Europe) and Australia’s Existing Anti-Corruption Platform. International Journal of Business and Commerce. (Vol. 4), 03 [in English].

France’s Anti-Corruption Strategy in Its Cooperation Action 2021-2030. Strategy report. Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs. DGM. [in English].

Institutional Arrangements to Combat Corruption. A Comparative Study. United Nations Development Programme. 2005. [in English].

Anka, Jurma (2017). V Rumunii' nihto ne ryzykne skazaty antykorupcijnomu prokuroru «ty mene zasmuchujesh» [In Romania, no one dares to tell the anti-corruption prosecutor «you upset me»]. Jevropejs'ka pravda – European truth. [in Ukrainian].

Special Investigation Service of the Republic of Lithuania. [in Ukrainian].

Trepak, V. M. (2016). Systema zahodiv antykorupcijnoi' dijal'nosti u rozvynutyh krai'nah svitu [System of measures of anti-corruption activity in developed countries of the world]. Publichne pravo – Public law, 1, 193-201. [in Ukrainian].



How to Cite

MAZARAKI А., & MELNYK Т. (2023). Ukraine’s cooperation with the EU in the field of preventing and countering corruption. oreign rade: onomics, inance, aw, 127(2), 4–33.




Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>