Backgrounds of administrative responsibility in sphere of folk medicine



administrative offense, administrative responsibility, alternative medicine, backgrounds of responsibility


BackgroundThe necessity to improve the mechanisms of administrative responsibility for violating the occupation of alternative medicine, including the provision of medical care without special education, requiresa clear definition of itsgrounds. The backgrounds of responsibility have great importance in administrative and tort relations and play a leading role in their objectification. Their presence activates the administrative and tort norm, drives into action the mechanism of its application and ultimately determines the practical aspect of administrative liability as such. Despite their significance, they are not reflected in the current legislation.
Analysis of recent research and publications. In the conditions of legislative uncertainty, the doctrinal understanding of the grounds of administrative responsibility is becoming of particular importance.
The aim of the article is to createa theoretical basis for solving current problems of jurisprudence, increasing the effectiveness of the institute of administrative responsibility in the field of alternative medicine.
Materials and methodsIn terms of research tasks, when writinga scientificarticle, the optimal set of general scientific and special methods of scientific knowledge, including methods: abstraction, deduction, analysis, synthesis, logical-legal, sociological, and others are used. The empirical basis of a scientific article is formedby: acts of the current legislation, statistical information, and scientific publications on administrative responsibility issues.
The results of the research. On the basis of analysis of modern scientific researches expediency of selection of four grounds is reasonable: normative, actual, legal and judicial. Normatively – the legal founding of responsibility is an array of legal norms, that is needed for qualification of act, trial of corresponding business and acceptance in her of the explained decision. What touches the actual founding, then the real fact of violation of rules of studying folk medicine is confessed in it. Basic description of the legal founding isa presence in actual encroachment of signs of composition of administrative misconduct. It becomes firmly established that it is suggested to consider the acceptance of judicial document – resolutions the judicial founding about imposition of administrative penalty. On the basis of analysis of home jurisdiction practice, the row of the problems related to determination of grounds of administrative responsibility in a sphere folk medicine is established.
ConclusionAnalysis of the grounds for administrative liability for violation of the rules of alternative medicine occupation makes it possible to state the presence of anumber of problems that complicate the process of administrative qualification and significantly reduce the efficiency of jurisdictional activity. The first steps in their direction should be the strengthening of administrative responsibility for the occupation of alternative medicineby persons, who do not have appropriate permission; specifying in administrative and tort law the features of the most common offenses in the sphere of occupation of alternative medicine; creation of an electronic database on the accounting and systematization of offenses in the field of engaging in alternative medicine.

Author Biographies

Taras GURZHIY, Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics

Doctor of Law, Professor, the Head of the Department of Administrative,
Financial and Information Law


Deputy assistant


Jesimov S. S. Pravovi pidstavy zastosuvannja administratyvnyh stjagnen'. Visn. Dnipropetrov. un-tu imeni Al'freda Nobelja. 2013. № 1 (4). S. 5–9. (Serija : Jurydychni nauky).

Gordjejev V. V. Jurydychnyj fakt jak pidstava administratyvnoi' vidpovidal'nosti. Juryd. elektron. nauk. zhurn. 2016. № 2. S. 189–191.

Administratyvne pravo ; za red. S. M. Alf'orova. Kyi'v : Centr uchbov. l-ry, 2011. 216 s.

Nadobko S. V. Administratyvna vidpovidal'nist' za porushennja zakonodavstva pro banky i bankivs'ku dijal'nist' : dys. ... kand. juryd. nauk : 12.00.07 – administratyvne pravo i proces. Harkiv, 2016. 198 s.

Pylypiv R. Novyj format administratyvno-pravogo reguljuvannja bezpeky dorozhn'ogo ruhu. Jurnalul juridic nationan: teorie si practica. 2016. № 2 (18). S. 57–61.

Bortnyk N., Jesimov S. Zmist administratyvnoi' vidpovidal'nosti za vchynennja pravoporushen' u sferi bezpeky dorozhn'ogo ruhu. Visn. Nac. un-tu «L'vivs'ka Politehnika». 2016. № 12. Ch. 1. S. 38–47. (Serija : Jurydychni nauky).

Gladun Z. S. Administratyvne pravo Ukrai'ny. Ternopil', 2004. 579 s.

Cjupryk N. O. Pryncypy ta pidstavy administratyvnoi' vidpovidal'nosti pracivnykiv organiv vnutrishnih sprav. Al'manah prava. 2012. Vyp. 3. S. 448–452.

Kucherenko O. M. Normatyvni pidstavy administratyvnoi' vidpovidal'nosti za porushennja pravyl dorozhn'ogo ruhu, shho sprychynylo DTP. Nauk. visn. Mizhnar. gumanitar. un-tu. 2016. № 21. S. 65–67. (Serija : Jurysprudencija).

Jarova R. V. Administratyvna vidpovidal'nist' special'nyh sub’jektiv – vodii'v avtotransportnyh zasobiv : dys. ... kand. juryd. nauk : 12.00.07 – administratyvne pravo i proces. Kyi'v, 2016. 233 s.

Administratyvna vidpovidal'nist' ta provadzhennja v spravah pro administratyvni pravoporushennja ; za zag. red. O. V. Kuz'menko. Kyi'v : Centr uchbov. l-ry, 2016. 388 s.

Gurzhij A. V. Pidstavy administratyvnoi' vidpovidal'nosti za porushennja pravyl perevezennja nebezpechnyh, velykogabarytnyh i velykovagovyh vantazhiv. Nauka i Pravoohorona. 2012. № 1 (15). S. 181–188.

Kodeks Ukrai'ny pro administratyvni pravoporushennja vid 07.12.1984 № 8073-X St. 46-2. URL :

Zakon Ukrai'ny pro «Osnovy zakonodavstva Ukrai'ny pro ohoronu zdorov’ja» vid 19.11.1992. № 2801-XII. URL :

Pro organizaciju roboty fizychnyh osib – pidpryjemciv, jaki zajmajut'sja narodnoju medycynoju (cilytel'stvom) : Nakaz M-va ohorony zdorov’ja Ukrai'ny vid 16.03.2016 № 189. URL :

Umovy zanjattja narodnoju medycynoju (cilytel'stvom) : zatv. Nakazom MOZ Ukrai'ny vid 16.03.2016 № 189. URL:

S'ogodni po krai'ni hodjat' 5 tysjach licenzovanyh cilyteliv / TSN. Ukrai'na vid 26.12.2011. URL :

Aver’janov V. B. Administratyvne pravo Ukrai'ny. Kyi'v : Juryd. dumka, 2004. 441 s.

Fryc'kyj O. F., Aver’janov V. B. Administratyvne pravo Ukrai'ny. Kyi'v : Juryd. dumka, 2004. 129 s.

Pro zatverdzhennja Porjadku perevirky zajavy ta dokumentiv, podanyh dlja otrymannja special'nogo dozvolu na zanjattja narodnoju medycynoju (cilytel'stvom) : nakaz M-va ohorony zdorov’ja Ukrai'ny vid 23.09.2013 № 823. URL :

Alf'orov S. M., Vashhenko S. V., Dolgopolova M.M., Kupin A. P. Administratyvne pravo. Kyi'v : Centr uchbov. l-ry, 2011. 81 s.

Mel'nyk R. S., Bevzenko V. M. Zagal'ne administratyvne pravo. Kyi'v : Vaite, 2014. 116 s.



How to Cite

GURZHIY Т., & BOROVYK Ю. (2017). Backgrounds of administrative responsibility in sphere of folk medicine. oreign rade: onomics, inance, aw, 94(5), 75–84. etrieved from