Trade and economic policy in the conditions of hybridization of interstate conflicts

Anatoliy MAZARAKI; Nataliya KALYUZHNA

doi:10.31617/zt.knute.2020(113)01

Authors

Anatoliy MAZARAKI Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5283-8444
Nataliya KALYUZHNA Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0513-705X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31617/zt.knute.2020(113)01

Keywords:

trade and economic policy, hybrid conflict, neo-protectionism, hybrid tools, asymmetry, foreign trade integration, escalation.

Abstract

It is established that an important base for interstate confrontation and a promising direction for the development of the concept of hybridity are trade and economic relations between the opposing parties. Based on the analysis of the current state and dynamics of interstate conflicts of varying intensity, the priorities of trade and economic policy of the state in a hybrid confrontation are defined on the following aspects: macroeconomic, sectoral, international, foreign trade, force majeure. The necessity of active use of economic-mathematical methods and management tools for estimation and forecasting the economic losses of the parties of hybrid confrontation is indicated.

Author Biographies

Anatoliy MAZARAKI, Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Rector

Nataliya KALYUZHNA, Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Professor at the Department of World Economy

References

Bond, M. S. Hybrid War: A New Paradigm for Stability Operations in Failing States. Retrieved from http://www.worldinwar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/ADA468398-1.pdf [in English].

Glenn,R. W. Thoughts on «Hybrid» Conflict. Retrieved from http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/thoughts-on-hybrid-conflict [in English].

McCuen,J. J. Hybrid Wars. Retrieved from https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals/7/military-review/Archives/English/MilitaryReview_20080430_art017.pdf [in English].

Frier, N. Hybrid Threats and Challenges: Describe... Dont Define. Retrieved from http://smallwarsjournal.com/blog/journal/docs-temp/343-freier.pdf [in English].

Hoffman,F. G. Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. Retrieved from http://www.potomacinstitute.org/images/stories/publications/potomac_hybridwar_0108.pdf [in English].

Kramer, F. D., & Speranza, L. M. Meeting the Russian Hybrid Challenge. A Comprehensive Strategic Framework. Retrieved from http://www.atlantic-council.org/images/publications/Meeting_the_Russian_Hybrid_Challenge_web_0530.pdf [in English].

Major, J., & Davis, Jr. (2015). Continued Evolution of Hybrid Threats: The Russian Hybrid Threat Construct and the Need for Innovation. The Three Swords Magazine, 28, 19-25. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/08c6/b9e234cd5c918f36dfd91b88967725a2be97.pdf [in English].

Chambers,J. (2016).Countering Gray Zone Hybrid Threats. An Analysis of Russias «New Generation Warfare» and Implications for the US Army. Modern War Institute at West Point. Retrieved from https://mwi.usma.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Countering-Gray-Zone-Hybrid-Threats.pdf [in English].

Lanoszka,A. (2016).Russian Hybrid Warfare and Extended Deterrence in Eastern Europe. International Affairs, 92 (1), 175-195. Retrieved from DOI: 10.1111/1468-2346.12509 [in English].

Kofman, M., & Rojansky,M. (2015). A Closer Look at Russias Hybrid War. Kennan Cable,7. Retrieved from https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/190090/5-KENNAN%20CABLE-ROJANSKY%20KOFMAN.pdf [in English] .

Mecklin, J. (2017). Introduction: The Evolving Threat of Hybrid War. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, (Vol. 73), (Issue 5), (pp. 298-299) [in English] https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2017.1362905.

Wither, J. K. (2016). Making Sense of Hybrid War. Connections: The Quarterly Journal, 2 (15), 73-87. Retrieved from DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11610/Connections.15.2.06 [in English].

Sadowski, D., & Becker, J. Beyond the «Hybrid» Threat: Asserting the Essential Unity of Warfare. Retrieved from http://smallwarsjournal.com/blog/journal/docs-temp/344-sadowski-etal.pdf [in English].

Martyniuk, V. (2018). Hibrydni zahrozy Ukraini i suspilna bezpeka. Dosvid YeS i Skhidnoho partnerstva.Analitychnyi dokument [Hybrid threats to Ukraine and public safety. Experience of the EU and the Eastern partnership. Analytical document]. Kyiv: Center for Global Studies Strategy XXI [in Ukrainian].

Horbulin, V. (2015). «Hibrydna viina» yak kliuchovyi instrument rosiiskoi heostratehii revanshu [«Hybrid war» as a key tool of Russia's geostrategy of revenge]. Dzerkalo tyzhnia – Mirroroftheweek. Retrieved from http://gazeta.dt.ua/internal/gibridna-viyna-yak-klyuchoviy-instrument-rosiyskoyi-geostrategiyi-revanshu-_.html http://gazeta.dt.ua/internal/gibridna-viyna-yak-klyuchoviy-instrument-rosiyskoyi-geostrategiyi-revanshu-_.html [in Ukrainian].

Kulytskyi, S. (2016). Ekonomichna skladova hibrydnoi viiny Rosii proty Ukrainy [The economic component of Russia's hybrid war against Ukraine]. Ukraina: podii, fakty, komentari – Ukraine: events, facts, comments, 20, 44-57 [in Ukrainian].

Radkovets, Yu. «Hibrydna polityka» suchasnoi Rosii yak stratehiia realizatsii yii natsionalnoi heopolityky [«Hybrid policy» of modern Russia as a strategy for implementing its national geopolitics]. Retrieved from http://bintel.com.ua/uk/article/gibrid-politics [in Ukrainian].

Andriievskyi, T. H. (2019). Hibrydna viina yak spetsyfichnyi typ hibrydnoho konfliktu [Hybrid warfare as a specific type of hybrid conflict]. Suchasne suspilstvo – Modern society, 2 (12), 5-14. Retrieved from DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.167217 [in Ukrainian].

Ienin, M. N., Melnychenko,A. A., & Melnyk, L. I. (2019). Hibrydna viina yak riznovyd sotsialno-politychnykh konfliktiv: sutnist, tekhnolohii, dominuiuchi dyskursy. [Hybrid warfare as a kind of socio-political conflicts: essence, technologies, dominant discourses]. Aktualni problemy filosofii ta sotsiolohii – Current issues of philosophy and sociology,25,102-112. Retrieved from DOI: https://doi.org/10.32837/apfs.v0i25.884 [in Ukrainian].

Bazyliuk, Ya.B. (2015). Zabezpechennia ekonomichnoi bezpeky Ukrainy v umovakh hibrydnoi viiny. [Ensuring the economic security of Ukraine in a hybrid war]. Stratehichni priorytety – Strategic priorities, 3 (36), 47-55 [in Ukrainian].

Varnalii, Z. C., & Tomashevckyi, T. T. (2019). Systemni problemy ta shliakhy zabezpechennia finansovoi bezpeky Ukrainy v umovakh hibrydnoi viiny [Systemic problems and ways to ensure the financial security of Ukraine in a hybrid war]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk universytetu – Economic Herald of the University, (Vol.41), (pp.171-179). Retrieved from DOI: https://doi.org/10.31470/2306-546X-2019-41-171-179 [in Ukrainian].

Vlasiuk, O. S. (2015). Ekonomichni chynnyky rozbudovy yevropeiskoho bezpekovoho prostoru v umovakh viiskovoi ahresii proty Ukrainy [Economic factors of development of the European security space in the conditions of military aggression against Ukraine]. Stratehichni priorytety – Strategic priorities, 2 (35), 5-14 [in Ukrainian].

Onyshchenko,V. P. (2019). Heoekonomichnyi zmist mizhnarodnykh konfliktiv [Geo-economic content of international conflicts]. Zovnishnia torhivlia: ekonomika, finansy, pravo – Foreign trade: economics, finance, law, 2 (103), 20-35. Retrieved from DOI: https://doi.org/10.31617/zt.knute.2019(103)02 [in Ukrainian].

Serpukhov, M. Yu. (2013). Otsinka vplyvu torhovelnykh viin na ekonomiku krainy [Assessment of the impact of trade wars on the country's economy]. Naukovyi visnyk Donbaskoi derzhavnoi mashynobudivnoi akademii – Scientific Bulletin of the Donbass State Engineering Academy.Kramatorsk, (Vol. 1 (11E), (pp.225-230) [in Ukrainian].

Shnyrkov, O. O. Systema ekonomichnykh sanktsii YeS shchodo tretikh krain [EU system of economic sanctions against third countries]. Retrieved from https://e-learning.iir.edu.ua/pluginfile.php/5069/mod_book/chapter/283/Shnyrkov-O.-systema-ekonomichnykh-sanktsii-YeS.pdf [in Ukrainian].

World Trade Organization. WTO Dispute Settlement. Retrieved from http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_e.htm [in English].

Voitov, S. H. (2015).Torhovelni sanktsii Rosii proty Ukrainy: analiz prychyn ta naslidkiv. [Russia's trade sanctions against Ukraine: an analysis of causes and effects]. Stratehiia rozvytku Ukrainy – Development strategy of Ukraine, 2, 56-61 [in Ukrainian].

Duhinets, H., & Pavlyshyna,K. (2019). Sanktsii u zovnishnii torhivli. [Sanctions in foreign trade]. Zovnishnia torhivlia: ekonomika, finansy, pravo –Foreign trade: economics, finance, law, 6 (107), 5-17. Retrieved from DOI: https://doi.org/10.31617/zt.knute.2019(107)01 [in Ukrainian].

Ofitsiinyi sait Derzhavnoho komitetu statystyky Ukrainy [Official site of the State Statistics Committee of Ukraine]. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].

Kalyuzhna, N. H., & Storozhchuk, V. M. (2020). Protyrichchia taryfnoi liberalizatsii v umovakh neoprotektsionizmu. [Contradictions of tariff liberalization in the conditions of neoprotectionism]. Zovnishnia torhivlia: ekonomika, finansy, pravo – Foreigntrade: economics, finance, law,2 (109), 5-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31617/zt.knute.2020(109)01 [in Ukrainian].