The Concept of guilt in Ukrainian law


  • Liudmyla SHESTOPALOVA Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics


the accused person, blame, guilt, guiltiness, fault, Legal Linguistics, offense, transgression


BackgroundSo far the lawmakers of Ukraine, lawyers and scientists have not accumulated the unified and well-established approaches to lexical design of the legal concept of «guilt» and related legal concepts.
Materials and methodsThe information base of research is the texts of existing legal acts of Ukraine and relevantscientific works of domestic scientists. The author used general scientific and special scientific methods, in particularstructural-systematic, that includes different components with their specific tasks and functions, which interact with each other for achievement of this objective, comparative legal and linguistic-legal methods and others.
Analysis of recent researches and publicationsFor the modern Ukrainian scientists who were engaged in legal interpretation of guilt, questions of definition and consolidation of its lexical-semantic configuration remains open. Therefore, the problem requires further study.
The aim of the article lies in the harmonization of legal approaches and the normalization of legal terminology to designate legal category and institution of guilt in the law and its branches, and other single-rooted terms.
The results of the studyThere were reviewed scientific-theoretical, legislative and practical legal approaches to the concept of guilt as an inter-branch Institute of law and related concepts, variability (duality) of use of single-root terms in this semantic «nest» in legal texts, given relevant examples. There was indicated that duality (parallelism) of language design of legal terminology does not promote the correct application of the law, and causes confusion and contradictions, conflicts of law. There was implemented legal and etymology-morphological analysis of the terms: fault, guilt, blame, transgression, guiltiness, the accused, etc. The attention is focused on their stylistic features and the semantic content in the theory of law and practical jurisprudence; the legal statuses marked by them were delimited.
ConclusionTheunified approach to the selection and proper application of legal terms of semantic nest in law, which are concentrated around the concept of «guilt» was justified and proposed.

Author Biography

Liudmyla SHESTOPALOVA , Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics

PhD in Law, senior researcher, Professor of the Department of General legal disciplines


Jurchak E. V. Teorija viny v prave : monografіja ; pod red. T. V. Kashaninoj. M. : Prospekt, 2016. 160 s.

Ashenden S., Brown J. Guilt. Economy and Society: Journal. Vol. 43. 2014. Issue 1. P. 1–18. URL :

Veresha R. V. Ponjattja vyny jak element zmistu kryminal'nogo prava Ukrai'ny : avtoref. dys. ... kand. juryd. nauk : 12.00.08. ; Kyi'v. nac. un-t imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Kyi'v, 2004. 20 s.

Gresa N. V. Psyhologichni chynnyky usvidomlennja vyny nepovnolitnimy zlochyncjamy : avtoref. dys. ... kand. psyhol. nauk: 19.00.06. ; Hark. nac. un-t vnutr. sprav. Harkiv, 2008. 20 s.

Martenko O. L. Psyhologichnyj analiz okremyh kryminal'no-pravovyh ponjat' (za chynnym KK Ukrai'ny) : avtoref. dys. ... kand. juryd. nauk : 19.00.06. ; Nac. akad. vnutr. sprav Ukrai'ny MVS Ukrai'ny. Kyi'v, 2005. 19 c.

Konstytucija Ukrai'ny vid 28.06.1996 r. № 254k/96-VR. URL :

Rishennja Konstytucijnogo Sudu Ukrai'ny u spravi za konstytucijnym podannjam Sluzhby bezpeky Ukrai'ny shhodo oficijnogo tlumachennja polozhennja chastyny tret'oi' st. 62 Konstytucii' Ukrai'ny : sprava № 1-31/2011 vid 20 zhovt. 2011 r. № 12-rp/2011. URL :

Kryminal'nyj kodeks Ukrai'ny : Zakon Ukrai'ny vid 5 kvit. 2001 r. № 2341-III. Vidom. Verhovnoi' Rady Ukrai'ny. 2001. № 25–26. St. 131.

Kryminal'nyj procesual'nyj kodeks Ukrai'ny : Zakon Ukrai'ny vid 13 kvit. 2012 r. № 4651-VI. Vidom. Verhovnoi' Rady Ukrai'ny. 2013. № 9–13. St. 88.

Kryminal'no-vykonavchyj kodeks Ukrai'ny Zakon Ukrai'ny vid 11 lyp. 2003 r. № 1129-IV. Vidom. Verhovnoi' Rady Ukrai'ny. 2004. № 3–4. St. 21.

Cyvil'nyj kodeks Ukrai'ny : Zakon Ukrai'ny vid 16 sich. 2003 r. № 435-IV. Vidom. Verhovnoi' Rady Ukrai'ny. 2003. № 40–44. St. 356.

Fasmer M. Jetimologicheskij slovar' russkogo jazyka ; per. s nem. O. N. Trubacheva. V 4-h t. : Russisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. 4-e izd., stereotip. M. : Astrel'. AST, 2004. T. 1. 588 s.

Kovalenko Je. G. Teorija dokaziv u kryminal'nomu procesi Ukrai'ny. Kyi'v : Jurinkom Inter, 2006. 632 c.

Kolesnik A. A. Mudrost' vekov. 1000 samyh vazhnyh myslej v istorii chelovechestva. M. : Jeksmo, 2013. 336 s.



How to Cite

SHESTOPALOVA Л. (2017). The Concept of guilt in Ukrainian law. oreign rade: onomics, inance, aw, 92(3), 5–15. etrieved from