AI technologies in the judiciary: european standards and ukrainian practice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2025(139)03

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence (AI), Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), Judiciary, Civil procedure, Abuse of procedural rights, Right to a fair trial.

Abstract

The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the growing influence of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on the field of justice, with a particular focus on developments within European and international institutions. Taking into account the increased academic attention to this issue, the article reviews key policy documents that set the ethical and operational framework for the use of AI in justice systems. The article also highlights the establishment of a dedicated Resource Centre on Cyberjustice and AI within the CEPEJ, that provides institutional support for the exchange of best practices and legal tools in the field of AI appli­cations in justice. The article aims to explore the introduction of developed policies during practical implementation of AI technologies in the field of justice, particularly in the Ukrainian context. The particular attention is paid to emerging trends and practices analysis in the use of AI in judicial processes, based on broader international and European standards. The research is divided into three main parts: the first part contains an overview of developed approaches to the use of AI in justice within the Council of Europe and other international organizations; the second part examines the first domestic regulatory initiative on the use of AI in the administration of justice, introduced by the High Anti-Corruption Court of Ukraine (HACC); the third part explores the approach of Supreme Court to the legal qualification and implications of the use of AI by parties of the case in their case law. The article contributes to the scientific debate on how national jurisdictions can responsibly adapt to technological innovations, while upholding fundamental legal principles and ensuring the protection of human rights in the digital era.

Author Biography

Tetiana TSUVINA, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

Doctor of Sciences (Law), Professor, Head of Civil Process, Arbitration and International Private Law Department

References

CEPEJ. (2018). European Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and Their Environment. https://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december-2018/16808f699c

CEPEJ. (2021a). Guidelines on electronic court filing (e-filing) and digitalisation of courts. https://rm.coe.int/cepej-2021-15-en-e-filing-guidelines-digitalisation-courts/1680a4cf87

CEPEJ. (2021b). Guidelines on videoconferencing in judicial proceedings. https://edoc.coe.int/en/efficiency-of-justice/10706-guidelines-on-videoconferencing-in-judicial-proceedings.html

CEPEJ. (2024.) European judicial systems CEPEJ Evaluation Report. https://rm.coe.int/cepej-evaluation-report-part-1-en-/1680b272ac

Committee of Ministers. (2020). Recommendation CM/Rec (2020)1 on the human rights impacts of algorithmic systems. https://rm.coe.int/09000016809e1154

Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights. (2020). Report on Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights "Justice by algorithm - the role of artificial intelligence in policing and criminal justice systems". https://assembly.coe.int/LifeRay/JUR/Pdf/DocsAndDecs/2020/AS-JUR-2020-22-EN.pdf

Congress of Judges of Ukraine. (2024). Code of Judicial Ethics. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/n0001415-13#Text

Consultative Council of European Judges. (2011). The Opinion No. 14 on justice and information technologies (IT). https://rm.coe.int/168074816b

Consultative Council of European Judges. (2023). The Opinion No. 26 "Moving forward: the use of assistive technology in the judiciary". https://rm.coe.int/ccje-opinion-no-26-2023-final/1680adade7

Decision of the Supreme Court on the 8th of February 2024 in case № 925/200/22. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/116984639

Dissenting Opinion of Judge Vronska in case № 925/200/22 on the 8th of February 2024. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/117074064?fbclid=IwAR1Qlz-_LguEXYcD-EJbVb-5-hNO9jlVCw3Ucm4FcuP4P9Te1D2rWgVci9M_aem_ATD8yNfuIhUMsr1cS9Mj3Km4NWFET0CzJM2SVWm5pdP_BOskeMlS-SoMtqlZTovpG8t2J1oKWjkjRVMR7VengUtQ

Dymitruk, M. (2019). The Right to a Fair Trial in Automated Civil Proceedings. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, 13(1), 27-44.

https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2019-1-2

High Anti-Corruption Court. (2024). The Principles for the Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in the High Anti-Corruption Court, approved by the Order of the High Anti-Corruption Court of 19 December 2024 № 56. https://court.gov.ua/storage/portal/hcac/documents/orders/19.12.2024_56.pdf

OECD. (2019). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (OECD/LEGAL/0449 (2019). https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/oecd-legal-0449

Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe. (2020). Resolution 2341 of the Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe "Need for democratic governance of artificial intelligence". http://www.europeanrights.eu/public/atti/Resolution_2341_(2020)_ENG.pdf

Razmetaeva, Yu. (2022) Algorithms in The Courts: Is There any Room for a Rule of Law. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 4(16), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-5.4-a000429

Razmetaeva, Yu., & Filatova-Bilous, N. (Eds.). (2024). European Fundamental Values in the Digital Era. Kharkiv: Pravo. https://doi.org/10.31359/9786178518073

Razmetaeva, Yu., & Razmetaev, S. (2021). Justice in the Digital Age: Technological Solutions, Hidden Threats and Enticing Opportunities. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 2(10), 104-117. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-4.2-a000061

Resource Centre Cyberjustice and AI. (2025). https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/cepej/viz/ResourceCentreCyberjusticeandAI/AITOOLSINITIATIVESREPORT?publish=yes

Tsuvina, T. A. (2020). Online courts and Online Dispute Resolution in terms of the international standard of access to justice. Problems of Legality, (149), 62-79. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.149.201782

Veress, E. (2021). Can justice be anything other than human? Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: Legal Studies, 10(2), 161-168. https://doi.org/10.47745/AUSLEG.2021.10.2.01

Zsolt, Z. (2021). Big-data-based legal analytics programs. what will data-driven law look like? Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: Legal Studies, 10(2), 287-302. https://doi.org/10.47745/AUSLEG.2021.10.2.09

Additional Files

Published

2025-04-29

How to Cite

[1]
TSUVINA, T. 2025. AI technologies in the judiciary: european standards and ukrainian practice. Foreign trade: economics, finance, law. (Apr. 2025), 4–13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2025(139)03.

Issue

Section

INTERNATIONAL LAW