Gatekeepersʼ obligations vested in the Digital Markets Act

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2024(137)01

Keywords:

EU, digital markets, competition, online platform, gatekeeper, obligations, EU law.

Abstract

The misuse of economic power by digital giants has highlighted the problem of distortion of competition in the online services market and the ineffectiveness of traditional competition law. This was the impetus for the adoption of the Digital Markets Act, which aims to specifically regulate the digital sector by establishing rules that ensure competitiveness and fairness in the EU internal market. The research hypothesis is to confirm the benefits of the ex ante obligations imposed by the DMA on online platforms with gatekeeper status in terms of strengthening fairness and competition, as well as ensuring the rights of business users and consumers in the digital sector of the economy. The purpose of the study is the functional description of the obligations of online platforms with gatekeeper status and the determination of prospects for their implementation. To achieve this goal, the method of doctrinal analysis was used, which helped to reveal the legal nature and peculiarities of the Digital Markets Act in general, as well as the gatekeeper obligations in particular. Ex ante obligations, as behavioral means of legal protection of the EU market against negative business practices, are aimed at preventing potentially undesirable behavior of gatekeepers, and also promote and protect intra- and cross-platform competition. It has been proven that the asymmetry of ex ante regulation, the competitiveness and fairness of digital markets as the goal of regulation, and the self-executing nature of obligations testify to the novelty of the regulatory regime introduced by the Digital Markets Act. Granting the European Commission a wide range of powers to monitor the compliance of online platforms with their obligations adds flexibility to the regulatory instrument, which, at the same time, requires further development in order to be significantly different from traditional competition law.

Author Biographies

Nataliia MAZARAKI, State University of Trade and Economics

Doctor of Science (Law), Professor, Head of the Department of International, Civil and Commercial Law

Andriy ZHYBAK, State University of Trade and Economics

Master, Postgraduate Student of the Department of International, Civil and Commercial Law

References

Ambrosio, F., Rückert, D., & Weiss, C. (2020). Who is prepared for the new digital age? Evidence from the EIB Investment Survey. http://surl.li/vpxgin

Andriychuk, O. (2023). Do DMA obligations for gatekeepers create entitlements for business users? Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, (11), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaenfo/jnac034

Bostoen, F. (2023). Understanding the Digital Markets Act. Antitrust Bulletin, 68(2), 263-306. http://surl.li/bntazj https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X231162998

Bradshaw, B., Herrick, P., & Jabouin, S. (2023). Upping the 'ante' on competition regulation: gambling with the future of Big Tech? Tech REG Chronicle, 13-21. http://surl.li/qzqgo

Budzinski, O., & Mendelsohn, J. (2021). Regulating Big Tech: From Competition Policy to Sector Regulation? Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers, 27(154), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3938167

Case AT.40684 Facebook Marketplace. (2021). http://surl.li/sxzmk

Case T‑612/17 Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition). (2021, November 10). Google LLC, Alphabet, Inc. v European Commission. http://surl.li/syzje

Case T-612/17: Action brought on 11.09.2017. (2017). Google and Alphabet v Commission. http://surl.li/syyxg

Commission Decision of 04.05.2017 relating to a proceeding under Article 102 of the TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.40153 - E-book MFNs and related matters (Amazon). (2017). http://surl.li/sxxiy

Commission Decision of 16.12.2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 102 of the TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C-3/39.530 - Microsoft (tying). (2009). http://surl.li/xvvqoi

Commission Decision of 18.07.2018 relating to a proceeding under Article 102 of the TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.40099 - Google Android). (2018). http://surl.li/sxxdp

Commission Decision of 20.03.2019 relating to a proceeding under Article 102 of the TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT. 40411 - Google Search (Ad Sense). (2019). http://surl.li/pmvvza

Commission Decision of 20.12.2022 relating to a proceeding under Article 102 of the TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.40462 - Amazon Marketplace and AT.40703 - Amazon Buy Box). (2022). http://surl.li/sxyff

Commission Decision of 24.05.2004 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 82 of the TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement against Microsoft Corporation (Case COMP/C-3/37.792 - Microsoft). (2004). http://surl.li/sxvml

Commission Decision of 27.06.2017 relating to proceedings under Article 102 of the TFEU and Article 54 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Case AT.39740 - Google Search (Shopping). (2017). http://surl.li/sxwqw

Compliance reports. (n. d.). http://surl.li/ticya

Crémer, J., Montjoye, Y-A., & Schweitzer, H. (2019). Competition Policy for the digital era. Final report. Publications Office of the European Union. http://surl.li/saosnq

Press Release. (2022). Digital Markets Act: Commission welcomes political agreement on rules to ensure fair and open digital markets. http://surl.li/rzrtj

Ending Platform Monopolies Act. H.R.3825. (2021). 117th Congress (2021-2022). http://surl.li/sxpwj

Enia, P. R. (2022). A Continental Rift? The United States and European Union's Contrasting Approaches to Regulating the Monopolistic Behavior of Gatekeeper Platforms, 16 Brook. J. Corp. Fin. & Com. L. http://surl.li/sxopn

European Commission, Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, Business-to-business relations in the online platform environment. (2017). Final report. Publications Office. http://surl.li/lwpfpe

Gatekeepers. The designation decision. (n. d.). http://surl.li/szxxq

Gerasymenko, A., & Mazaraki, N. (2022). Competition law enforcement in Ukraine: challenges from on-line giants. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, (26), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2022.15.26.3

Mendelsohn, J., & Budzinski, O. (2023). DMA: background, objectives, and its relationship to competition law. New Digital Markets Act. A Practitioner's Guide, 5-22. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509974214.ch-002 https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748937067-3

Monti, G. (2021). The Digital Markets Act: Improving Its Institutional Design. European Competition and Regulatory Law Review, 5(2), 90-101. https://doi.org/10.21552/core/2021/2/4

Montjoye, Y., Schweitzer, H., & Crémer, J. (2019). Competition policy for the digital era. Publications office of the EU. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2763/407537

OECD. (2021). Ex ante regulation of digital markets. OECD Competition Committee Discussion Paper. http://surl.li/qzqgk

OECD. (2022). Gatekeeper Power in the Digital Economy: An Emerging Concept in EU Law. Note by Alexandre de Streel. http://surl.li/syzsf

Press Release 23-337. (2023). Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter Delivers Opening Remarks at the Second Annual Spring Enforcers Summit. http://surl.li/qzqfr

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act) - 2020/0374 (COD). (2020). http://surl.li/swxac

Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). (2016). http://surl.li/hwmobz

Regulation 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act). (2022). http://surl.li/qzqgp

Summary of Commission Decision of 04.03.2024 relating to a proceeding under Article 102 of TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.40437 - Apple - App Store Practices (music streaming). (2024). http://surl.li/vzlqzf

Trib. com. Paris, March 28, 2022, No. RG 2018017655. Google Inc v. Minister of the Economy. (2022). http://surl.li/xgxshb

Dziukevych, К. (2023). Adaptation of the EU single market to the era of digitalization. Economy and society, (54), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-54-11

Published

2024-11-18

How to Cite

[1]
MAZARAKI Н. and ZHYBAK А. 2024. Gatekeepersʼ obligations vested in the Digital Markets Act. Foreign trade: economics, finance, law. (Nov. 2024), 4–19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2024(137)01.

Issue

Section

Legal Sciences

Funding data

  • European Commission
    Grant numbers Advocacy of European Rules of Competition, 101047657 – AERC – ERASMUS-JMO-2021-HEI-TCH-RSCH.