Global financial crisis, the coronavirus pandemic, war and what else is (not) considered a significant change in circumstances (Article 652 of the Civil Code of Ukraine)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2024(134)05

Keywords:

fundamental change of circumstances, complications, force majeure, contract, obligation, contract law, war, coronavirus, quarantine.

Abstract

The study is devoted to Article 652 of the Civil Code of Ukraine, according to which a party has the right to demand termination or amendment of the contract if the circumstances have changed funda­mentally compared to what they were at the time of the contract conclusion. This Article is one of those that parties to contractual disputes invoke very often, but almost never successfully. The purpose of this paper is to try to explore the reasons for this pheno­menon in Ukrainian judicial practice and to outline the conditions under which one can count on success in proving that the circumstances have changed substan­tially enough to meet the conditions for application of Article 652 of the Civil Code of Ukraine. Methodo­logically, the study is based on the analysis of the practice of the highest courts of Ukraine with inclusions of the comparative legal method and references to the rules of international contract law and the practice of other jurisdictions. In the first, theoretical part of the study, the author offers a general explanation of what a fundamental change of circumstances is and what role it plays in the dynamics of contractual relations between the parties. The author compares a fundamental change of circumstances with force majeure. Next, five conditions for the applicability of Article 652 of the Civil Code of Ukraine were consi­dered and commented on. It is followed by an analysis of significant categories of cases that illustrate the difficulty in proving a fundamental change of circumstances. These are cases related to such historical events as the global financial crisis of 2008, the ban on gambling in Ukraine in 2009, the nationalisation of Privatbank in 2016, the coronavirus pandemic and related quarantine restrictions, and finally the war and the full-scale invasion of the Russian Federation into Ukraine. The review and critical analysis of landmark court decisions makes it possible to give concrete meaning to the elements of a fundamental change of circumstances with specific content and to identify trends that have marked themselves in the judicial practice.

Author Biography

Bohdan KARNAUKH, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

PhD (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Civil Law Department

References

UNIDROIT. (2016). Principles of International Commercial Contracts. https://www.unidroit.org/english/principles/contracts/principles2016/principles2016-e.pdf

Anatoniolli, Luisa, & Fiorentini, Francesca. (2010). A Factual Assessment of the Draft Common Frame of Reference. Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783866538696

Hondius, Ewoud, & Grigoleit, Christoph. (2011). Unexpected Circumstances in European Contract Law. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763335

The High Commercial Court of Ukraine. (2010, June 1). Resolution of the High Commercial Court of Ukraine in case No. 42/254-09. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/10000135

Supreme Court of Ukraine. (2010, April 28). Resolution of the Supreme Court of Ukraine in the case № 51/506. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/9473767

Supreme Court of Ukraine. (2012, February 20). Resolution of the Supreme Court of Ukraine. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/22207353

Supreme Court. (2018, October 16). Resolution of the Supreme Court of Ukraine in the case № 910/17686/17. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/77263637

Supreme Court. (2018, April 17). Resolution in the case № 905/1409/17. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/73700070

Supreme Court. (2019, September 19). Resolution in the case № 910/10899/18. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/84484684

Supreme Court. (2019, July 2). Resolution in the case № 910/15484/17. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/83000592

Supreme Court. (2019, November 20). Resolution in the case № 500/373/17. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/85966484

Supreme Court. (2020, February 25). Resolution in the case № 922/2279/19. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/88027352

Supreme Court. (2021, July 21). Resolution in the case № 912/3323/20. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/99277353

Supreme Court. (2021, February 24). Resolution in the case № 910/8425/19. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/95343928

Supreme Court. (2021, August 31). Resolution in the case № 910/15264/21. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/106078967

Supreme Court. (2022, July 13). Resolution in the case № 363/1834/17. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/105852863

Supreme Court. (2023, June 14). Resolution of the Supreme Court of Ukraine in the case № 910/8232/22. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/111739215

Supreme Court. (2023, November 7). Resolution in the case № 920/660/22. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/114860459

Supreme Court. (2024, March 15). Resolution in the case № 500/89/17. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/117823566

Supreme Court. (2024, January 17). Resolution in the case № 925/155/23. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/116606332

Supreme Court. (2024, April 25). Resolution in the case № 910/5489/21. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/118626667

Law of Ukraine "On Consumer Lending" № 1734-VII (2016, November 15). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1734-19#Text

Law of Ukraine "On Chambers of Commerce and Industry in Ukraine" № 671/97-VR (1997, December 2). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/671/97-%D0% B2%D1%80#Text

ІСС. (2020, March). Icc Force Majeure and Hardship Clauses. https://iccwbo.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/03/icc-forcemajeure-hardship-clauses-march2020.pdf

Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine "Some issues of ensuring the stability of the financial system" № 961 (2016, December 18). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/961-2016-%D0%BF#Text

CC of UKRAINE. (2003). Doc. 16.01.2003 № 435-IV. Current edition of 27.04.2024. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text

Published

2024-06-11

How to Cite

[1]
KARNAUKH Б. 2024. Global financial crisis, the coronavirus pandemic, war and what else is (not) considered a significant change in circumstances (Article 652 of the Civil Code of Ukraine). Foreign trade: economics, finance, law. 134, 3 (Jun. 2024), 46–68. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2024(134)05.

Issue

Section

PRIVATE LAW