Establishment of the childʼs place of residence by the European Court of Human Rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2024(132)04Keywords:
the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, the best interests of the child, place of residence, legal ties with the state.Abstract
OF HUMAN RIGHTS
The article is devoted to the generalization of the legal approaches of the European Court of Human Rights to solving the issue of determining the childʼs place of residence. The relevance of the topic of this study is due to migration processes, as well as the complication of legal regulation of family relations, in particular, in disputes arising during the determination of the childʼs place of residence. In such conditions, when resolving disputes by national courts about the determination of the childʼs place of residence, it is important to take into account the practice of the European Court of Human Rights in the relevant category of cases. The basis of this study is the hypothesis that, according to the legal position of the European Court of Human Rights, the principle of taking into account the best interests of the child should be applied when solving any issues related to the child. At the same time, the application of this approach cannot be reduced to some single way of solving the issue of establishing the childʼs place of residence with one of the parents – the mother or another relative, since in each specific case national courts have to clarify a number of issues. In order to verify the above hypothesis, the author reviewed a number of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, which relate to the issue of determining the place of residence of a child, illegal movement of a child across the state border of the country of origin, etc. As a result of the conducted research, the proposed hypothesis was partially confirmed and it was found that although there really is no universal legal position of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the procedure for taking into account the principle of the best interests of the child, the study of such practice shows that the Court adheres to the position according to which national courts must carefully check all the circumstances of the case, involve, if necessary, pedagogical workers, psychologists in order to act in the best interests of the child.
References
Beaumont, P., Trimmings, K., Walker, L. & Holli-day, J. (2015). Child abduction: recent jurisprudence of the European Court of human rights. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 64, 1, 39-63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589314000566
Case of Olindraru v. Romania (ECHR, 2019, 1490/17). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ukr#{%22fulltext%22:[%22Olindraru%20v.%20Romania%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-191714%22]}
Case OF Širvinskas v. Lithuania (ECHR, 2019, 21243/17). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ukr#{%22fulltext%22:[%22%C5%A0irvinskas%20v.%20Lithuania%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22,%22CHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-194735%22]}
Handbook on European law relating to the rights of the child. European Union Agency for Funda-mental Rights and Council of Europe (2022). https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/handbook_rights_child_eng
Helland, T. (2019). Care order cases in the European Court of Human Rights Parentsʼ vs. childrenʼs rights. Masterʼs Thesis in Administration and Organizational Science. https://bora.uib.no/bora-xmlui/bitstream/handle/1956/20265/Care-order-cases-in-the-ECtHR---Parents--vs--children-s-rights.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Schuz, R. (2023). Habitual Residence: Review of Developments and Proposed Guidelines. Special Issueю. Contemporary Issues Relating to Interna-tional Child Abduction in Contemplation of the Eighth Special Commission into the Operation of the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/12/4/62 https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12040062
European Convention on the Exercise of Childrenʼs Rights (1996). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_135#Text
Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (with Protocols) (1950). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text
Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989). UN. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_021#Text
Kuibida, R., Rybak, V., & Sereda, M. (et all.) (2020). Report on the results of monitoring court processes in Ukraine. Standards of child-friendly justice and their implementation in Ukraine (non-criminal aspect). Coordinator of OSCE projects in Ukraine, 88.
Lykholat, I. (2014). Contractual procedure for determining the childʼs place of residence in notarial practice. Notary of Ukraine, 12, 27-39.
Oliinyk, A. (2022). Current issues regarding the consideration of family disputes in the conditions of martial law. Presentation materials. https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/media/new_folder_for_uploads/supreme/2022_prezent/2022_11_07_Oliinyk_28_10.pdf
The case "Vyshniakov v. Ukraine". (2018). ECtHR, 25612/12. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_d01#Text
The case of "M.S. against Ukraine". (2017). ECtHR, 2091/13. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng/#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-175140%22]}
Yakusha, V. (2021). The presumption in favour of the mother in disputes over the determination of the childʼs place of residence is disappearing like a myth. Law and business. 14 (1520). https://zib.com.ua/ua/147233.html
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)