Virtual arbitration of foreign economic disputes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2023(129)07Keywords:
virtual arbitration proceedings, arbitration, arbitration agreement, remote proceedings, digitization.іAbstract
In the system of alternative methods of resolving foreign economic disputes, forms of arbitration proceedings play a key role. The digitization of many spheres of social life, in particular the procedure for resolving disputes, prompts a large number of institutional arbitration institutions to implement virtual proceedings as an urgent need for the global business community. The main issue in this context is the relationship between "direct" and "virtual" arbitration. The purpose of the article is to highlight the results of the research of both legislative regulation and law enforcement practice of a number of countries of the world regarding "virtual" arbitration proceedings for possible implementation and further unification in the Ukrainian legal system. The methods used are: structural-logical and system-functional analysis; comparative legal. The definitive construction of "virtual arbitration proceedings" is analysed through the prism of legislative regulation of many countries of the world. Highlighting the key problematic issues of the Ukrainian legislative regulation of virtual arbitration proceedings, ways to improve this procedural institution are proposed.
References
Gary Born et al., "Empirical Study of Experiences with Remote Hearings: A Survey of Usersʼ Views", in International Arbitration and the COVID-19 Revolution, (pp. 137-150)
Maxi Scherer, "Remote Hearings in International Arbitration: An Analytical Framework", (2020), Journal of International Arbitration, 37, Issue 4, pp. 407-448. https://doi.org/10.54648/JOIA2020020
Prytyka, Ju. D. (2018). Online arbitration: concepts, features and prospects of implementation in Ukraine. Visnyk Nacionalʼnoiʼ Akademiiʼ pravovyh nauk Ukraiʼny. Bulletin of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 3, 186-196. https://doi.org/10.31359/1993-0909-2018-25-3-186
Polataj, V. Ju. (2017). Electronic arbitration. Legal scientific electronic journal, 6, 22-35
Paolo, Marzolini, Daniel Durante. "Switzerland: Does a Right to a Physical Hearing Exist in International Arbitration?," ICCA Projects https://cdn.arbitration-icca.org/s3fs-public/document/media_document/Switzerland-Right-To-A-Physical-Hearing-Report.pdf
See, Lucy Martinez and Jay Tseng, "Australia: Does a Right to a Physical Hearing Exist in Interna-tional Arbitration?," ICCA Projects https://cdn.arbitration-icca.org/s3fs-public/document/media_document/Australia-Right-to-a-Physical-Hearing-Report-October%202022.pdf
International Relief and Development Inc v Ladu (2013). FCA 1216 https://jade.io/article/306029
Oberster Gerichtshof in Republik Österreich, 18 ONc 3/20s-2, 2020; https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Justiz/JJT_20200723_OGH0002_018ONC00003_20S0000_000/JJT_20200723_OGH0002_018ONC00003_20S0000_000.pdf
Ola, 0. Nisja and Per Aleksander Tonnessen, "Norway: Does a Right lo a Physical Hearing Exist in Interna-tional Arbitration?," ICCA Projects https://cdn.arbitration-icca.org/s3fs-public/document/media_document/Norway-Right-to-a-Physical-Hearing-Report.pdf
Geir WOXHOLTH, Voldgift, 1st edn. (Gyldendal Norsk Forlag AS 2013) p. 612
Act of 14 May 2004 No. 25 relating to Arbitration https://www.newyorkconvention.org/11165/web/files/document/2/1/21101.pdf
Act relating to mediation and procedure in civil disputes (The Dispute Act) https://lovdata.no/dokument/NLE/lov/2005-06-17-90/*
Resolution of the Civil Court of Cassation dated August 4, 2022 in the case № 824/217/21 https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/105693664
Guidance Note on Possible Measures Aimed at Mitigating the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic, ICC International Chamber of Commerce, April 2020, available at https://iccwbo.org/publication/icc-guidance-note-on-possible-measures-aimed-at-mitigating-the-effects-of-the-covid-19-pandemic
Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce, in force as from 1 March 2017 https://library.iccwbo.org/content/dr/RULES/RULE_ARB_2017_EN_25.htm?l1=Rules&l2=Arbitration+Rules
Guidance Note on Remote Dispute Resolution Proceedings https://www.ciarb.org/media/8967/remote-hearings-guidance-note.pdf
Oral hearings in times of COVID-19 https://www.cepani.be/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Newsletter-May-June-2020-12-06-2020_250790_1.pdf
HKIAC Guidelines For Virtual Hearings https://www.hkiac.org/sites/default/files/ck_filebrowser/PDF/services/HKIAC%20Guidelines%20for%20Virtual%20Hearings.pdf
The Vienna Protocol - A Practical Checklist for Remote Hearings https://www.viac.eu/images/documents/The_Vienna_Protocol_-_A_Practical_Checklist_for_Remote_Hearings_FINAL.pdf
Arbitration Rules of the Vienna International Arbitration Centre https://www.viac.eu/images/documents/vienna_rules/АРБІТРАЖНИЙ_РЕГЛАМЕНТ_ТА_РЕГЛАМЕНТ_З_МЕДІАЦІЇ_OH.pdf
Oberster Gerichtshof in Republik Österreich, 18 ONc 3/20s-2. (2020). https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Justiz/JJT_20200723_OGH0002_018ONC00003_20S0000_000/JJT_20200723_OGH0002_018ONC00003_20S0000_000.pdf
ICAC Annual Report 2020 - 24 pages of the most up-to-date information on the development of international arbitration in Ukraine and the world https://icac.org.ua/novyny-ta-publikatsiyi/richnyj-zvit-icac-2020-24-storinky-najaktualnishoyi-informatsiyi-pro-rozvytok-mizhnarodnogo-arbitrazhu-v-ukrayini-i-sviti
IMPORTANT INFORMATION regarding the work of ICAC and UMAC of Ukraine during the martial law regime https://icac.org.ua/novyny-ta-publikatsiyi/vazhlyva-informatsiya-shhodo-roboty-mkas-ta-mak-pry-tpp-ukrayiny-protyagom-rezhymu-voyennogo-stanu
Decision of the Kyiv Court of Appeals dated June 25, 2021 in the case № 824/75/21 https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/97910473 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NT.0000803416.27386.ae
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)