Economic rivalry between the USA and China in the technological sphere

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2023(128)02

Keywords:

national security, innovation strategy, technological leadership, Research and Development (R&D), China, USA, high-tech sector.

Abstract

International experience proves that in the post-industrial era there is a direct correlation between technological innovations, the scientific and technical potential of the country, and its economic power. Technologies are becoming a driver of transformations not only in the economy, but also in geopolitics, having a critical impact on the comprehensive economic development and military power of states. In view of the uncertainty and tension in the relations between the United States and China, the problem of identifying the nature and directions of the rivalry between the world’s most influential countries in the technolo­gical sphere is becoming urgent. The aim of the article is to reveal the state and level of confrontation of economic rivalry between the United States and China in the technological sphere. Methods of analysis and synthesis, comparison, grouping and systemati­zation, and elements of the institutional approach were used. It has been determined that the newest stage of economic rivalry between states is characterized by the complication of the tools of competition and the expansion of the spheres of global confrontation. As an important prerequi­site for achievements in the technological sphere should be considered powerful institutional support: both in the United States and in China. The US leadership is based on: powerful economic potential; favorable investment climate; significant financial opportunities of the consumer sector; dominance in dual-purpose industries; high investment efficiency both in domestic and global markets. The achieve­ments of China in the technological sector can be defined as dynamic, and the activities of the state are focused on the formation of long-term competitive advantages. The combination of geopolitics and the priorities of technological confrontation reflects both open and latent competition between China and the USА, in particular for control over the instruments and norms that will determine the course of international relations in the medium and long term. The displacement of Chinese business from supply chains for high-tech sectors can lead to a significant reorganization of international production networks formed in recent decades and intensifi­cation of reshoring processes in many technolo­gical processes and links.

Author Biographies

Liudmyla KUDYRKO, State University of Trade and Economics

PhD (Economics), Professor, Professor of Department of World Economy

Anhelina TSYPIASHCHUK, State University of Trade and Economics

bachelor of the International Economics program

References

Graham, A. (2020). The New Spheres of Influence Sharing theGlobe with OtherGreat Powers. Foreign Affairs, 99(2), 30-40 [in English].

Jones, B. (2020). China and the Return ofGreat Power Strategic Competition. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/research/china-and-the-return-of-great-power-strategic-competition [in English].

Center, S., & Bates, Е. (2019). Tech-Politik, Historical Perspectives on Innovation, Technology, and Strategic Competition. Center for Strategic & International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/tech-politik-historical-perspectives-innovation-technology-and-strategic-competition [in English].

Carafano, J. J. (2020). Technology andGreat Power Competition: 5 Top Challenges for the Next Decade. The Heritage Foundation. https://www.heritage.org/technology/commentary/technology-and-great-power-competition-5-top-challenges-the-next-decade [in English].

Boustany, C. W., & Friedberg, A. L. (2019). Partial Disen-gagement – A New U.S. Strategy for Economic Competition with China. NBR Special Report. https://www.nbr.org/publication/partial-disengagement-a-new-u-s-strategy-for-economic-competition-with-china [in English].

Fesenko, M. (2015). The struggle of the USA and China for global leadership in the 21st century. International relations. Series «Political Sciences», 6. http://journals.iir.kiev.ua/index.php/pol_n/article/view/2554/2263 [in Ukrainian].

Duzha, I. A. (2018). The evolution of US policy in the Asia-Pacific region. Bila Tserkva: DNVZ BNAU [in Ukrainian].

Iakubovskyi, S. O., Rodionova, T. A., & Babin-chuk, O. S. (2020). US-China trade conflict: causes and consequences. Bulletin of V.N. Karazin KhNU. Series «International relations. Economics. Local studies. Tourism», 11. https://doi.org/10.26565/2310-9513-2020-11-04 [in Ukrainian].

Zosymenko, T. (2021). Ukraine's economic interests against the background of contradictions in the US-China-EU geopolitical triangle. Analytical note of the program «Economic Diplomacy of the Council of Foreign Policy». Ukrainian prism [in Ukrainian].

A Strategy for american Innovation (2015). https://www.strategy_for_american_innovation_october_2015.pdf [in English].

A Strategy for american Innovation. Securing Our Economic Growth and Prosperity. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/InnovationStrategy.pdf [in English].

Made in China 2025. https://isdp.eu/content/uploads/2018/06/Made-in-China-Backgrounder.pdf [in English].

Global Innovation Index (2021). Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.

https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2021.pdf [in English].

National Patterns of R&D Resources (2022). National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation, https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf22320 [in English].

UNESCO (2022). Cross-National Comparisons of R&D Performance. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20225/cross-national-comparisons-of-r-d-performance [in English].

OECD (2023), Gross domestic spending on R&D (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/d8b068b4-en [in English].

The World Bank (2023) Research and development expenditure. https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx? dsid=46&series=GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS [in English].

Wu, D., Hoenig, H., & Dormido, H. (2019). Who's Winning the Tech Cold War? A China vs. U.S. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2019-us-china-who-is-winning-the-tech-war [in English].

Leading tech companies worldwide (2022). https://www.statista.com/statistics/1350976/leading-tech-companies-worldwide-by-market-cap [in English].

Number of internet and social media users world-wide as of January 2023. https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide [in English].

Number of mobile wireless subscriber connections in the United States from 1985 to 2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/185783/estimated-number-of-wireless-connections-in-the-united-states-since-1985 [in English].

Number of mobile internet users in China from 2012 to June 2022. https://www.statista.com/statistics/273973/number-of-mobile-internet-users-in-china/ [in English].

GDP per capita, current prices. https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDPDPC@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD [in English].

Davis, B., Drew, F. (2020). U.S. Pushing Effort to Develop 5G Alternative to Huawei. Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-pushing-effort-to-develop-5g-alternative-to-huawei-11580831592 [in English].

Butyrska, N. (2021). Can Beijing achieve technological superiority without the United States? Dzerkalo tyzhnia. https://zn.ua/ukr/international/kitaj-vojuje-zi-ssha-za-pravo-keruvati-svitom-visokikh-tekhnolohij.html [in Ukrainian].

Diamond, J., Fung, В. (2023) The Biden adminis-tration is shifting approach to TikTok.CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2023/03/08/tech/biden-tiktok-bill/index.html [in English].

TikTok: Social Media Heavyweight.

https://www.statista.com/chart/29467/app-revenue-ad-revenue-market-shares-social-media [in English].

Government Space Programs (2022).

https://www.euroconsult-ec.com/press-release/new-record-in-government-space-defense-spendings-driven-by-investments-in-space-security-and-early-warning [in English].

Brand Finance Aerospace & Defense. (2022) URL: https://brandirectory.com/rankings/aerospace-and-defence/2022 [in English].

China Military Power Report (2022). https://media.defense.gov/2022/Nov/29/2003122279/-1/-1/1/2022-MILITARY-AND-SECURITY-DEVELOPMENTS-INVOLVING-THE-PEOPLES-REPUBLIC-OF-CHINA.PDF [in English].

Buchholz, K. (2023) Where Students Choose STEM Degrees. https://www.statista.com/chart/22927/share-and-total-number-of-stem-graduates-by-country [in English].

The Future of Jobs. Report. (2020). https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2020.pdf [in English].

PISA (2018). https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/2018database [in English].

Published

2023-06-23

How to Cite

[1]
KUDYRKO Л. and TSYPIASHCHUK А. 2023. Economic rivalry between the USA and China in the technological sphere. Foreign trade: economics, finance, law. 128, 3 (Jun. 2023), 14–29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2023(128)02.

Issue

Section

ECONOMIC SPACE