Principle of res judicata and prejudicialness in the consideration of cases in international commercial arbitration

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2022(124)06

Keywords:

principles of civil procedure, principle of res judicata, international commercial arbitration, preclusive effect, preclusive facts.

Abstract

Introduction. The principle of res judicata means the finality of a court decision that has entered into force, which makes it impossible to further unreasonably revise, change or cancel of such judgment. This principle is recognized to be a principle of civil procedure, whereas the preclusive effect of court judgments, however, the effect of this principle is broader and is not limited to civil proceedings, covering also quasi-judicial methods of alternative dispute resolution, in particular arbitration.

The problem. Currently, the issue of whether arbitral awards may have a preclusive effect in subsequent proceedings in the same or other arbitration or in subsequent court proceedings involving the same persons remains controversial in the literature.

The aim of the article is to reveal the peculiarities of the preclusive effect of arbitral awards as a component of the res judicata principle subsequent proceedings between the same parties in international commercial arbitration or court.

Methods. The research methods are: dialectical, analysis and synthesis, systematic and comparative legal, comparison and analogy.

Results. Preclusive effect of awards as one of the aspects of the principle of res judicata in arbitration should be recognized as the need to take into account the preclusive effect of the facts established in the award during subsequent subsequent proceedings between the same parties in international commercial arbitration or court.

Conclusions. Giving preclusive effect to the facts established in the arbitral award in subsequent court proceedings between the same parties through legislative changes to the procedural legislation. The need to take into account the adjudicative facts established in the arbitral award in subsequent proceedings in the same or another arbitration is considered expedient to be resolved by amending the rules of interna­tional commercial arbitration or by settling this issue by the parties themselves in the arbitration clause.

Author Biography

Yehor KOLDOV, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

Postgraduate student of the Department of Civil Justice and Advocacy

References

Konvencija pro zahyst prav ljudyny i osnovopolozhnyh svobod: Mizhnarodnyj dokument vid 04.11.1950 r. [Convention on the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms: International document dated November 4, 1950.] zakon.rada.gov.ua. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text (data zvernennja: 29.08.2022) [in Ukrainian].

Gujvan, P. D. (2017). Res Judicata jak element spravedlyvogo sudochynstva [Res Judicata as an element of fair trial]. Pravo i suspil'stvo – Law and society, 6, 360-364 [in Ukrainian].

Dodge, W. S. (2000). National courts and international arbitration: exhaustion of remedies and res judicata under chapter eleven of NAFTA Hastings Int’l & Comp.L Rev. Vol. 23 [in English].

Chang, B. (1953). General principle of law as Applied by international courts and tribunals. Cambridge University Press [in English].

Yuval, S. (2011). Reconsidering Res judicata: A Comparative perspective. Duke Journal of comparative &international law, Vol. 21, (pp. 353-400) [in English].

International Law Association Resolution No. 1/2006, Annex 2: Recommendations on res judicata and Arbitration: Міжнародний документ від 01.01.2006 р. http://translex.uni-koeln.de/803600/_/international-law-association-resolution-no-1-2006-annex-2:-recommendations-on-res-judicata-and-arbitration (data zvernennja: 29.08.2022) [in English].

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. Possible future work in the field of dispute settlement: Concurrent proceedings in international arbitration, Note by the Secretariat. №А/CN.9/915: Mizhnarodnyj dokument vid 24.03.2017 r. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/V17/017/91/PDF/V1701791.pdf?OpenElement (data zvernennja: 29.08.2022) [in English].

Konvencija pro vyznannja ta pryvedennja do vykonannja inozemnyh arbitrazhnyh rishen'. Mizhnarodnyj dokument vid 10.06.1958 r. [Convention on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. International document dated June 10, 1958.] zakon.rada.gov.ua. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_070#Text (data zvernennja: 30.08.2022). [in Ukrainian].

Pil'kov, K. M. (2021). Res Judicata ta sporidneni doktryny ostatochnogo sudovogo rishennja: porivnjal'no-pravovyj aspekt [Res Judicata and related doctrines of final judgment: a comparative legal aspect]. Elektronne naukova vydannja «Analitychno-porivnjal'ne pravoznavstvo» – Electronic scientific publication «Analytical and comparative jurisprudence», 3, 15-22. [in Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2021.03.2.

Cuvina, T. A. (2021). Realizacija pryncypu res judicata u cyvil'nomu sudochynstvi: dosvid zarubizhnyh derzhav [Implementation of the principle of res judicata in civil proceedings: the experience of foreign countries]. Chasopys Kyi'vs'kogo universytetu prava – Journal of the Kyiv University of Law, 1, 220-225 [in Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.36695/2219-5521.1.2020.44.

Di Brozolo, R., Luca, G. (2012). Res Judicata and International Arbitral Awards. ASA Special Series, (pp. 1-23) [in English].

Kravcov, S. O. (2012). Mizhnarodnyi komerciinyi arbitrazh ta naconal'ni sudy: dysertacija na zdobuttja naukovogo stupenja kandydata jurydychnyh nauk za special'nistju 12.00.03 [International commercial arbitration and national courts: thesis for obtaining the scientific degree of Candidate of juridical sciences in the specialty 12.00.03]. Harkiv [in Ukrainian].

Pil'kov, K. M. (2019). Umovy obov’jazkovosti dlja gospodars'kogo sudu faktiv, vstanovlenyh v inshij spravi [Conditions of obligation for the commercial court of facts established in another case]. Pravo i suspil'stvo – Law and society, 11, 106-116 [in Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2019.11.17.

Sheppard, A. (2005). The Scope and Res Judicata Effect of Arbitral Awards [in English].

Schaffstein, S. (2005). The Doctrine of Res Judicata Before International Commercial Arbitral Tribunals. Oxford International Arbitration Series [in English].

Hovaguiman, P. (2017). The Res Judicata Effects of Foreign Judgments in Post-Award Proceedings: To Bind or Not to Bind? Journal of International Arbitration. Vol. 34, Issue 1, (pp. 79-106) [in English] https://doi.org/10.54648/JOIA2017005.

Van de Velden, J., & Stefanelli, J. (2009). The Effect in the European Community of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters: Recognition, Res Judicata and Abuse of Process. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law. (pp. 14-15) [in English].

Söderlund, Ch. Lis Pendens, (2005). Res Judicata and the Issue of Parallel Judicial Proceedings. Journal of International Arbitration. Vol. 22 [in English] https://doi.org/10.54648/JOIA2005017.

Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, 24 July 2003. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61261 (data zvernennja: 31.08.2022) [in English].

Svetlana Naumenko v. Ukraine, no. 41984/98, 09 November 2004. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-67357 (data zvernennja: 31.08.2022) [in English].

Protsenko v. Russia, no. 13151/04, 31 July 2008. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-87892 (data zvernennja: 31.08.2022) [in English].

Brumărescu v. Romania, no. 28342/95, 28 October 1999. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58337 (data zvernennja: 31.08.2022) [in English].

Nikitin v. Russia, no. 50178/99, ECHR 2004-VIII. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61928 (data zvernennja: 31.08.2022) [in English].

Zheltyakov v. Ukraine, no. 4994/04, 09 June 2011. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-10490322 (data zvernennja: 31.08.2022) [in English].

Ponomaryov v. Ukraine, no. 3236/03, 03 April 2008. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-85683 (data zvernennja: 31.08.2022) [in English].

Diya 97 v. Ukraine, no. 19164/04, 21 October 2010. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-101189 (data zvernennja: 31.08.2022) [in English].

Trukh v. Ukraine, no. 50966/99, 14 October 2003. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-23085 (data zvernennja: 31.08.2022) [in English].

Khristov v. Ukraine, no. 24465/04, 19 February 2009. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91376 (data zvernennja: 31.08.2022) [in English].

Bodiu v. The Republic of Moldovano. 7516/10, 18 June 2019. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?I=001-193874 (data zvernennja: 31.08.2022) [in English].

Osovska and others v. Ukraine, no. 2075/13, 28 June 2018. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?I=001-183950 (data zvernennja: 31.08.2022) [in English].

Bezrukovy v. Russia, no. 34616/02, 10 May 2012. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110806 (data zvernennja: 31.08.2022) [in English].

Brletic v. Croatia, no. 42009/10, 16 January 2014. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-140018 (data zvernennja: 31.08.2022) [in English].

Industrial Financial Consortium Investment Metallurgical Union v. Ukraine, no. 10640/05, 26 June 2018. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-184068 (data zvernennja: 31.08.2022) [in English].

Esertas v. Lithuania, no. 50208/06, 31 May 2012. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i= 001-111215 (data zvernennja: 31.08.2022) [in English].

Kehaya and others v. Bulgaria, no. 47797/99 and 68698/01, 12 January 2006. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus?i=001-72559 (data zvernennja: 31.08.2022) [in English].

Koldov, Je. O. (2021). Elementy pryncypu res judicata u cyvil'nomu sudochynstvi u praktyci JeSPL [Elements of the principle of res judicata in civil proceedings in the practice of the ECHR]. Pravo i suspil'stvo – Law and society, 5, 65-73 [in Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.32842/2078-3736/2021.5.9.

Masjuk, V. V. (2011). Prezumpciï ta prejudyciï v cyvil'nomu sudochynstvi [Presumptions and prejudices in civil proceedings]. Harkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Postanova Verhovogo Sudu u skladi kolegii' suddiv Kasacijnogo gospodars'kogo sudu u spravi № 927/976/17 vid 12.06.2018 [Resolution of the Supreme Court as part of the panel of judges of the Cassation Economic Court in the case № 927/976/17 dated Lune 12, 2018]. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/74670250 (data zvernennja: 30.08.2022) [in Ukrainian].

Gudyma, M. M. (2017). Prejudycial'nist' sudovyh aktiv jak instytut cyvil'nogo procesual'nogo prava [Prejudicialness of judicial acts as an institution of civil procedural law]. Pravo i suspil'stvo – Law and society, 2, 52-56 [in Ukrainian].

Reznyk, G. M. (1971). Vnutrennee sudejskoe ubezhdenye y pryjudycyja. Sovetskaja justycyja, (pp. 10-11) [in Ukrainian].

Associated Electric and Gas Insurance Services Ltd (Aegis) v European Reinsurance Company of Zurich (European Re), 29 January 2003 in ICC case № 1041. https: www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5b2897fe2c94e06b9e19ebe2 (data zvernennja: 31.08.2022) [in English].

Mexican construction company v. Belgian company, 14 June 1979 in ICC case № 3767. https://files.pca-cpa.org/pcadocs/bi-c/1.%20Investors/4.%20Legal%20Authorities/CA360.pdf (data zvernennja: 20.08.2022) [in English].

Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada and others v The Lincoln National Life Insurance Co., 10 December 2004 in ICC case № 675. https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff7b060d03e7f57eb141e (data zvernennja: 31.08.2022) [in English].

Published

2022-10-26

How to Cite

[1]
KOLDOV Є. 2022. Principle of res judicata and prejudicialness in the consideration of cases in international commercial arbitration. Foreign trade: economics, finance, law. 124, 5 (Oct. 2022), 66–77. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2022(124)06.

Issue

Section

INTERNATIONAL LAW