The duty to verify the target when using autonomous weapons

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2026(144)12

Keywords:

international humanitarian law, lethal autonomous weapon systems, artificial intelligence, duty to verify targets, principle of distinction.

Abstract

The article examines the conditions for compliance with the duty to verify targets under Article 57(2)(a)(i) of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions when lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS) are employed. The central problem arises where the human decision to employ a weapon system precedes the determination of the specific object of attack, while its detection, identification, and individuation are subsequently performed autonomously by the system. The article aims to establish the criteria under which reliance on autonomous target identification may satisfy the obligation to do everything feasible to verify that an object is a lawful target. Drawing on a doctrinal analysis of Article 57(2)(a)(i), the ICRC Commentary, State military manuals, and contemporary scholar­ship, the article identifies the normative components of the duty of target verification and applies them to autonomous target selection. It argues that autonomy does not alter the standard imposed by Article 57(2)(a)(i), but changes the manner in which that standard is implemented. Although developers of LAWS do not thereby become direct addressees of the duty to verify, information generated through testing and valida­tion concerning system accuracy, errors, and opera­tional limitations becomes legally relevant to those responsible for an attack. The article proposes a legal test under which compliance depends on whether reliance on autonomous target identifi­cation is justified in light of the systemʼs validated reliability, conditions of use, quality of its infor­mational basis, known limitations, and residual uncertainty.

Author Biographies

Liliia NEVARA, State University of Trade and Economics

PhD (Law), Associate Professor,
Associate Professor at the Department of International, Civil and Commercial Law

Yuliia HONCHAROVA, State University of Trade and Economics

PhD (Law), Dean of Faculty of International Trade and Law

Nataliia MELNYCHENKO, State University of Trade and Economics

PhD (Law), Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor at the Department of International,
Civil and Commercial Law

References

Breeze, E. J. (2024). Duty to act on knowledge: Precautions, intelligence and the law of armed conflict. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 29(3), 311-329. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krae015

Quéguiner, J.-F. (2006). Precautions under the law governing the conduct of hostilities. International Review of the Red Cross, 88(864), 793-821. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383107000872

Wolf, R. (2025). Applying precautions in target verification with AI decision support systems. Israel Law Review, 58(2-3), 282-305. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223725100071

Voss, L. (2025). The overlooked importance of intelligence analysis in IHL. International Review of the Red Cross, 107(928), 287-310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383124000584

Sari, A., & Evans, G. (2026). The military use of AI and the law of armed conflict: What role for government and industry? Defence Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2026.2686609

International Committee of the Red Cross. (2026). Autonomous weapon systems and international humanitarian law [Position paper]. https://www.icrc.org/sites/default/files/2026-03/4896_002_Autonomous_Weapons_Systems_-_IHL-ICRC.pdf

Sandoz, Y., Swinarski, C., & Zimmermann, B. (Eds.). (1987). Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers & International Committee of the Red Cross.

McFarland, T. (2022). Minimum levels of human intervention in autonomous attacks. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 27(3), 387-409. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krac021

Sari, A. (2026). Target selection by autonomous weapons systems: What does the duty of target verification require? ECIL Working Paper 2026/2. Exeter Centre for International Law, University of Exeter.

Forsvaret. (2025). Manual i krigens folkerett. Forsvaret.

U.S. Department of Defense. (2023). Department of Defense law of war manual (Updated July 2023). Office of General Counsel, Department of Defense.

Dill, J. (2019). Do attackers have a legal duty of care? Limits to the 'individualization of war'. International Theory, 11(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971918000222

Woodcock, T. K. (2026, July 17). AI-enabled targeting and the structural strain on international humanitarian law. Opinio Juris. http://opiniojuris.org/2026/07/17/ai-enabled-targeting-and-the-structural-strain-on-international-humanitarian-law/

Published

2026-09-16

How to Cite

[1]
NEVARA Л., HONCHAROVA Ю. and MELNYCHENKO Н. 2026. The duty to verify the target when using autonomous weapons. Ius Modernum. 144, 3 (Sep. 2026), 36–49. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2026(144)12.

Issue

Section

INTERNATIONAL LAW