Categorical and legal determination of plagiarism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2025(139)09

Keywords:

copyright, plagiarism, academic, integrity, self-plagiarism, legislation, creation.

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the legal categories "plagiarism", "academic plagiarism", "self-plagiarism" from the standpoint of their correlation with each other and their compliance with the current legislation of Ukraine in the fields of copyright and academic integrity. A hypothesis is put forward about the existence of certain contradictions in the legal content of these cate­gories, which is partially confirmed on the basis of theoretical models based on the authorʼs experience, given in other empirical cases and innovations of the Law of Ukraine "On Copyright and Related Rights". The content and structure of the categories "copyright", "plagiarism", "academic plagiarism", "self-plagiarism", "academic integrity" are analysed, the areas of intersection of their subject areas are traced. An attempt is made to carry out a systematic disposition of these categories and a new refined definition of the category of "academic plagiarism" is proposed. It is concluded that in terms of content, the broadest of these categories is "academic integrity". The categories of "copyright" and "plagiarism" are parts of a single system, because plagiarism is a type of copyright infringement. The concepts of "plagiarism" and "academic plagiarism" are close, but not identical; the first category partially overlaps the subject area of the second. Both categories are currently in need of revision. The category of "self‑plagiarism" is not directly related to plagia­rism or academic plagiarism, but it belongs to the types of violations of academic integrity norms, and in some cases, it may also entail copyright violations.

Author Biography

Andrii BOIAR, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University

Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Head of the Department of International Economic Relations and Project Management

References

Fishman, T. (2009). "We know it when we see it" is not good enough: toward a standard definition of plagiarism that transcends theft, fraud, and copyright. University of Wollongong Conference contribution. https://hdl.handle.net/10779/uow.27825690.v1

Ithenticate. (2011). The Ethics of Self-Plagiarism. https://www.ithenticate.com/hs-fs/hub/92785/file-5414624-pdf/media/ith-selfplagiarism-whitepaper.pdf

Mudrak, B., & Yasutis, K. (2024). Self-Plagiarism: How to Define it and Why You Should Avoid It. American Journal Experts. https://www.aje.com/en/arc/self-plagiarism-how-to-define-it-and-why-to-avoid-it

Rolg, M. (2015). Avoiding Plagiarism, Self-plagiarism, and Other Questionable Writing Practices: A Guide to Ethical Writing. https://ori.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/plagiarism.pdf

Scanlon, P. M. (2007). Song from myself: An anatomy of self-plagairism. In Plagiary: Cross-Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification (pp. 57-66). https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/p/pod/dod-idx/song-from-myself-an-anatomy-of-self-plagiarism.pdf?c=plag;idno=5240451.0002.007;format=pdf

Stanford University. (2011). What Is Plagiarism? https://communitystandards.stanford.edu/policies-guidance/bja-guidance-definitions-and-clarifications/what-plagiarism

University of Cambridge. (2023). University-wide Statement on Plagiarism. https://www.plagiarism.admin.cam.ac.uk/what-plagiarism/universitys-definition-plagiarism

Yale University. (2025). What Is Plagiarism? https://ctl.yale.edu/writing/using-sources/understanding-and-avoiding-plagiarism/what-plagiarism

Bakhrushyn, V. (2018). Academic plagiarism and self-plagiarism in science and higher education: regulatory framework and world experience. Educational Policy: Portal of Public Experts. http://education-ua.org/ua/articles/1128-akademichnij-plagiat-i-samoplagiat-v-nautsi-ta-vishchij-osviti-normativna-baza-i-svitovij-dosvid

Bernatskyi, O. V. (2020). Plagiarism as a violation of intellectual property rights. In Human rights in Ukraine: past, present, future (pp. 74-76). https://library.pp-ss.pro/index.php/ndippsn_20201210/article/view/bernatsskyi/419

Verbovska, R. I., & Divnych, T. Ya. (2019). Academic plagiarism. Types of plagiarism. In Academic integrity: challenges of our time (pp. 30-33). https://www.iiasc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/iiasc_academic_integrity_ 12_2019.pdf

Law of Ukraine "On Copyright and Related Rights" (2023). Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, (57). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2811-20#Text

Law of Ukraine "On Scientific and Scientific-Technical Activities" (2016). Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, (3). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/848-19#Text

Law of Ukraine "On Education" (2017). Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, (38-39). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19#Text

Kovalenko, T. (2014). Plagiarism: types and respon¬sibilities. Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property, (46). http://www.ndiiv.org.ua/Files2/2014_4/6.pdf

Nikolaiev, Ye. (2019). Academic integrity. Newsletter, (2). https://zu.edu.ua/doc/academic-integrity/02-academic-integrity.pdf; https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/cpai.v2i1.68526

Sychyk, O., & Blinchuk, O. (Eds.). (2020). Copyright and Plagiarism. Precarpathian University, Scientific Library. http://lib.pnu.edu.ua/files/pokajchiki/plagiat2020.pdf

Civil Code of Ukraine (2003). Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, (40-44). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text

Yakubivskyi, I. (2023). Academic plagiarism as a type of violation of academic integrity. New Ukrainian Law, (4). https://doi.org/10.51989/NUL.2023.4.17

Published

2025-06-11

How to Cite

[1]
BOIAR А. 2025. Categorical and legal determination of plagiarism . Foreign trade: economics, finance, law. 139, 2 (Jun. 2025), 106–116. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2025(139)09.

Issue

Section

PRIVATE LAW