SBAM in the international trade regulation system

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2026(143)02

Keywords:

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), "Monitoring, Reporting, Verification" (MRV), EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), WTO, GATT, tariff measures/barriers, non-tariff measures/barriers.

Abstract

This article is dedicated to the characteristics of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism at the EU border (CBAM) with regard to its place in the system of tariff and non-tariff measures regulating international trade. The relevance of the study is determined by the growing influence of the environ­mental component on international and domestic trade regimes, as well as by the inclusion of "carbon intensity" parameters in the conditions for market access for goods (in particular, the European Union, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland). The hypothesis is put forward according to which CBAM does not have the characteristics of customs or tariff regulation, and its essence and application features correspond to certain characteristics of non-tariff regulation of international trade and, at present, actually form a non-tariff "procedural" regulatory barrier based on mandatory requirements for monitoring, reporting, and verifying of emissions. Accordingly, when studying the place of CBAM in the system of tariff and non-tariff regulation measures of international trade, the national practice of states, and the approaches of the World Trade Organization, certain features of the Mechanism have been systematized for compliance with the characteristics of tariff or non-tariff regula­tion. The content of some international and domestic legal acts has been analysed and compared in terms of their interconnection and correlation (in particular, Regulation (EU) 2023/956, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, and relevant provisions of the legislation of the United Kingdom and Switzerland). The impact of international and national components on both the theoretical and practical aspects of CBAM’s operation has been summarized, as well as the practice of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body and the need for a comprehensive approach in this field has been indicated. The obtained results confirm that CBAM is not a customs duty or internal tax and is not levied at the time of customs clearance, which precludes its qualification as a measure of customs-tariff regulation. The organizational and legal structure of CBAM corresponds to the characte­ristics of a non-tariff "procedural" market access instrument, as it provides for mandatory disclosure of embedded emissions data, their independent verification, and links the possibility of import to the fulfilment of MRV procedures. It has been proven that such a SBAM qualification entails the applic­ability of Articles I and III of the GATT, the provi­sions of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, and the need of justifying its legitimacy under Article XX of the GATT. The formulated conclusions define the key international legal implications of CBAM’s operation and establish new requirements for third countries concerning the alignment of emissions assessment procedures with the regulatory require­ments of the European Union.

Author Biographies

Viktoriia HOLUBIEVA, State University of Trade and Economics

РhD (Law), Рrofessor, Рrofessor of the Deрartment of International, Civil and Commercial Law

Yelyzaveta HOLOVKO, State University of Trade and Economics

Leading specialist at the International Relations Office

References

Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on the linking of their greenhouse gas emissions trading systems. (2024, December 4). Document 22017A1207(01). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/agree_internation/2017/2240/oj/eng

Ahmad, I. (2025). Review of Content Analysis of EUʼs Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism Concerning Consistency with WTO. International Journal of Law and Legal Advancement, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.64060/IJLLA.v1i1.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.64060/IJLLA.v1i1.4

Beaufils, T., Ward, H., Jakob, M. et al. (2023). Assessing different European Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism implementations and their impact on trade partners. Commun Earth Enviro, (4), 131. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00788-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00788-4

Bellora, C., & Fontagné, L. (2022). EU in Search of a WTO-Compatible Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. Working Paper, 2022-01. https://cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2022/wp2022-01.pdf; https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4168049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4168049

Bradford, А. (2020). The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190088583.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190088583.001.0001

Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (Text with EEA relevance). (2024). Current consolidated version: 01/03/2024. Document 32003L0087. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2003/87/oj/eng

Durel, L. (2024). Border carbon adjustment compliance and the WTO: the interactional evolution of law. Journal of International Economic Law. 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgae007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgae007

EU. European Council. (n.d.). Fit for 55. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/fit-for-55/

Ivanova, R. (2025). Customs Tariff Regulation in the Context of WTO Law: Ukraine's Commitments, Implementation, and Prospects for Trade Facilitation. National interests of Ukraine, 4(9). https://doi.org/10.52058/3041-1793-2025-4(9)-308-318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52058/3041-1793-2025-4(9)-308-318

Kaduk, O. (2021). Promotion of renewable energy in the EU and Ukraine. Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal, (7). https://doi.org/10.18523/kmlpj249913.2021-7.129-147 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18523/kmlpj249913.2021-7.129-147

Lim, B., Hong, K., Yoon, J., Chang, J.-I., & Cheong, I. (2021). Pitfalls of the EUʼs Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. Energies, 14(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217303

Liu, J., Wang, W., Jiang, T., Ben, H., & Dai, J. (2025). Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism as a Catalyst for Greenfield Investment: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms Using a Difference-in-Differences Model. Sustainability, 17(8). 3492. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083492 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083492

Maksymova, I. (2023). Digitalization-based integration of climate policies of Ukraine and the EU. Journal of European Economy, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.35774/jee2023.01.093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/jee2023.01.093

Regulation (EU) 2019/515 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2019 on the mutual recognition of goods lawfully marketed in another Member State and repealing Regulation (EC) No. 764/2008 (Text with EEA relevance). (2019). Document 32019R0515. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/515/oj/eng

Regulation (EU) 2023/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism. (2023). Current consolidated version: 20.10.2025. Document 32023R0956. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/956/oj/eng

Switzerland. The Federal Assembly of the Swiss Confederation. (2025). Federal Act on the Reduction of CO2 Emissions (CO2 Act) of 23 December 2011 (Status as of 1 January 2025) (SR 641.71). https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2012/855/en

Switzerland. The Swiss Federal Council. (2019). Ordinance on the Reduction of CO2 Emissions (CO2 Ordinance) (SR 641.711, amended 13 November 2019). https://www.newsd.admin.ch/newsd/message/attachments/59069.pdf

UK Parliament. (2025). Finance (No. 2) Bill 2025-26 (Bill 342). https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/59-01/0342/240342.pdf

UNCTAD. (2015). International classification of non-tariff measures. 2012 Version. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ditctab20122_en.pdf

World Trade Organization. (2001). Argentina - Measures Affecting the Export of Bovine Hides and the Import of Finished Leather. Report of the Panel (WT/DS155/R). https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=Q:/WT/DS/155R.pdf&Open=True

World Trade Organization. (2001). European Communities - Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products. Report of the Appellate Body (WT/DS135/AB/R). https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/135abr_e.pdf

World Trade Organization. (2006). Mexico - Tax Measures on Soft Drinks and Other Beverages. Report of the Appellate Body (WT/DS308/AB/R). https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename= Q:/WT/DS/308ABR.pdf&Open=True

World Trade Organization. (2012). United States - Measures Concerning the Importation, Marketing and Sale of Tuna and Tuna Products (WT/DS381). Appellate Body Report. https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=Q:/WT/DS/381ABR.pdf&Open=True

World Trade Organization. (2025). russia - European Union (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism). Request for consultations by the russian federation (WT/DS639/1). https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=Q:/G/L/1573.pdf&Open=True

Burakovskyi, I., Kravchuk, K., Movchan, V. et al. (2015). Technical barriers and sanitary and phytosanitary measures in international trade: types, development trends, regulation. http://www.ier.com.ua/files/publications/Books/Sanitary_measures.pdf

Burakovskyi, I., Movchan, V., Kravchuk, K., Kuziakiv, O., Fedets, I., Kosse, I., Betlii, O., Kravchuk, V., Shynkaruk, K., Dvorak, Ya., & Kutsenko, K. (2012). Ukraineʼs Membership in the WTO: Institutional and Economic Effects. Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting. http://www.ier.com.ua/files/publications/News/2012/28.11.2012_presentations/Report_for_presentation_26-11-2012_final.pdf

Vatahovych, M. І. (2017). Modern Theoretical Principles of Custom Regulations in the context of state regulation of the national economy: international aspects. Efficient economy, (8). http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=6933

Hamaniuk, O., Taran, S., Khorunzha, M., Shepotylo, O., & Yavorskyi, P. (2020). Ukrainian exports to the EU: the impact of non-tariff measures. https://kse.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/EU-NTMs_2020-02-18_new-1.pdf

General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT 1947). (1947). GATT. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_264#Text

General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT 1994). (1994). WTO. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/981_003#Text

Gоlubieva, V. O. (2004). International Legal Regulations of Foreign Economic Activities and Ukrainian National Legislation (Non-Tariff Aspect) [Doctoral dissertation]. Ukrainian Academy of Foreign Trade.

Gordiienko, A. V. (2024). European regulatory legal acts on air and airspace protection. Law and public administration, (2). http://pdu-journal.kpu.zp.ua/archive/2_2024/36.pdf

Hudyma, T. S., Dzhabrailov, R. A., & Yeremieieva, N. V. (2025). Prospects for enhancing the legal framework for carbon credit implementation in Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University, 90(2). https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.90.2.40 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.90.2.40

Guzhva, I. Yu. (2017). Current Issues in Foreign Trade Policy of Ukraine. National Academy of Management. https://nam.kyiv.ua/files/publications/monograf-0711.pdf

Hutsul, I. A. (2018). Customs policy of foreign countries. Ternopil National Economic University.

Datsenko, A. (2024). The influence of "CBAM" on the development and competitiveness of the metallurgical industry of Ukraine. Economy and society, (70). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-70-99 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-70-99

Datsenko, A. (2025). Peculiarities of adaptation of Ukrainian metallurgy to the mechanism of cross-border carbon regulation. Economic achievements: prospects and innovations, (17). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15220994

European Business Association. (2025). CBAM: the EU cross-border carbon tax: what it is and how it will affects business? https://eba.com.ua/cbam-transkordonnyj-vugletsevyj-podatok-yes-shho-tse-i-yak-vplyne-na-biznes/

Ivanov, Ye. (2025). Сarbon border adjustment mechanism as a factor in deepening asymmetry in trade between Ukraine and the EU. Via Economica, (8). https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-8559/2025-8-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-8559/2025-8-6

Kainara, D. O. (2016). The Theoretical Basis of Trade Barriers. Efficient economy, (2). http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/pdf/2_2016/36.pdf

Kapliuchenko, T. V. (2016). Legal Regulation of market surveillance on the EU Internal Consumer Market for Non-Food Products [Abstract of Candidateʼs thesis in Law]. National University "Odessa Law Academy".

Kolisnyk, A. S. (2024). The Importance of Non-Tariff Barriers in the Legal Regulation of International Trade Relations. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University, 86(2). https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2024.86.2.20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2024.86.2.20

Ksendzuk, V. V. (2020). Mechanisms of Formation and Implementation of the State Foreign Trade Policy of Ukraine. O. O. Yevenok. https://eztuir.ztu.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/8060/%D0%9A%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B7%D1%83%D0%BA_%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B3%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%84%D1%96%D1%8F_2020.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Lozo, O. V., & Troian, A. O. (2025). Legal Regulation of the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading system: EU Experience and Prospects for Ukraine. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, (10). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2025-10/34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2025-10/34

Movchan, V., Kosse, I. et al. (2021). Integration within the framework of the association: the dynamics of the implementation of the Agreement between Ukraine and the EU. Analytical report. http://www.ier.com.ua/files/Projects/Integration_UA_EU/Report_Integration_final_ua.pdf

Oleinyk, A.-M. S., & Roshko, S. (2023). Analysis of the Impact of Tariff and Non-Tariff Restrictions on Trade Relations Between the EU and Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University, (49). https://doi.org/10.32782/2413-9971/2023-49-18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2413-9971/2023-49-18

Orlova, V. M. (2001). Non-Tariff Barriers in International Trade: an Attempt of Conceptual assessment. Scientific notes. Series: Economic sciences, (19). https://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/2c7df494-5c75-4f85-a58e-26d5b48 f4832/content

Poіedynok, V. (2024). The "just transition" mechanism as a component of the European green deal. Economics and law, 75(4). https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2024.04.052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2024.04.052

Agreement on Implementation of Article VII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994. (1994). WTO. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/981_011#Text

Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade. (1994). WTO. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/981_008#Text

Centre for Economic Recovery. (2025). CBAM carbon levy and Ukrainian industry: challenges and risks. Ukrainian Energy. https://ua-energy.org/uk/posts/vuhletseve-myto-cbam-i-ukrainska-promyslovist-udar-chy-mozhlyvist

Published

2026-06-19

How to Cite

[1]
HOLUBIEVA В. and HOLOVKO Є. 2026. SBAM in the international trade regulation system. Ius Modernum. 143, 2 (Jun. 2026), 13–33. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2026(143)02.

Issue

Section

INTERNATIONAL LAW