THE LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE LAW

Authors

  • Liudmyla SHESTOPALOVA Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics

Keywords:

liability, negative legal responsibility, positive legal responsibility, legal institution, the structure of law, legal liability

Abstract

Background. The responsibility is an important feature of the society, persons and the law. The scientists in the law are disputing still about the structure of the legal liability and its place in the law.
The aim of the article is to deepen the theory of legal responsibility basedon the place and role determination of legal responsibility through its essential characteristics.
Materials and methods. The information base of research is the law of Ukraine, domestic scientific works in the law. Researches used general scientific and special legal methods: systemic, that includes different components with their specific tasks and functions, which interact with each other for achievement of this objective, comparative legal and linguistic methods and others.
Analysis of recent researches and publications. Sue, the works of some contemporary Ukrainian scientists are devoted to the study of the complex legal responsibility. But the problem of its role and essence has not received sufficient popularity among the domestic scientists, so there is a need for profound research of such concepts.
Results. The author investigated legal responsibility as an obligatory structural element and an attribute of law (legal liability), and as an integrated interdisciplinary institution of the law also, composed of two sub-institutions of law – negative legal responsibility and positive legal responsibility. The article defines the role of legal responsibility in the legal system in the broad sense, as well as its place in the structure of law. The author proves that legal responsibility is a complex, multidimensional category. The article contains a some of features of legal responsibility in the structure of the law.
Conclusion. So, legal responsibility is characterized not only by co-complexity, but also diffuseness, synergism, dialecticity, and its matrix is an indicator of the degree of humanistic development of the legal relations in a specific society.

Author Biography

Liudmyla SHESTOPALOVA , Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics

PhD in Law, senior researcher, professor of the department of general law disciplines

References

Tkachenko I. M. Teoretyko-pravova harakterystyka jurydychnoi' vidpovidal'nosti. Pravo i suspil'stvo. 2015. № 5(2). S. 35–37.

Mashkov A. Pogljad na jurydychnu vidpovidal'nist' jak riznovyd pravovidnosyn ta jogo znachennja dlja formuvannja suchasnoi' jurydychnoi' teorii' vidpovidal'nosti. Visn. Kyi'v. nac. un-tu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Jurydychni nauky. 2010. Vyp. 84. S. 98–101.

Mysak O. Teoretychni problemy vyznachennja zmistu jurydychnoi' vidpovidal'nosti. Pidpryjemnyctvo, gospodarstvo i pravo. 2016. № 7. S. 129–132.

Berlach N. A. Perspektyvy rozvytku pozytyvnoi' jurydychnoi' vidpovidal'nosti v demokratychnomu suspil'stvi. Forum prava. 2012. № 1. S. 77–81.

Makushev V. P. Pravova ta gromadjans'ka kul'tury jak riznovyd sociokul'turnyh faktoriv z formuvannja systemy strymuvan' i protyvag pobudovy gromadjans'kogo suspil'stva. Pravo i suspil'stvo. 2009. № 3. S. 8–16.

Sulejmenov M. K. Pravo kak sistema. Almaty : Zanger, 2011. 344 s.

Kozjubra M. I. Osnovni formy buttja prava ta vzajemovidnosyny mizh nymy. Pravo Ukrai'ny. 2011. № 8. S. 21–30.

Rogers E. M. Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press, 2003. 576 р.

Slyvka S. S. Pryrodne ta nadpryrodne pravo : monografija. Kyi'v : Atika, 2005. 224 s.

Bezklubyj I. A., Bobrovnyk S. V., Grycenko I. S. Vidpovidal'nist' u pravi: filosofija, istorija, teorija. Kyi'v : Gramota, 2014. 448 s.

Published

2018-04-06

How to Cite

SHESTOPALOVA Л. (2018). THE LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE LAW. Foreign·trade:·economics,·finance,·law, 97(2), 5–15. etrieved from https://journals.knute.edu.ua/foreign-trade/article/view/349

Issue

Section

THEORY AND HISTORY OF STATE AND LAW